ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
RIP - beliefs about IT culture: exploring national and gender differences
Full text PdfPdf (254 KB)
Source
Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research Annual Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on Computer personnel research: The global information technology workforce table of contents
St. Louis, Missouri, USA
SESSION: Cross-cultural table of contents
Pages: 217 - 220  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-641-7
Authors
Indira R. Guzman  Touro University International, Cypress, CA
Damien Joseph  Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
K. N. Papamichail  Manchester Business School, Manchester, UK
Jeffrey M. Stanton  Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMIS: ACM Special Interest Group on Management Information Systems
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 74,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1235000.1235050
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This multi country study of the IT occupational culture builds on US data to examine differences in IT occupational perceptions in the United Kingdom, Singapore, Malaysia, India and Australia. In this research in progress we present survey data about the adaptation to the cultural characteristics of the IT occupation and its relationship with occupational commitment. This paper presents the initial data results collected in the above five countries. So far, our preliminary data supports previous findings in that adaptation to the occupational culture in the information technology field predicts occupational commitment and more significantly affective occupational commitment. While no significant differences were found across countries, further analysis is currently being conducted to evaluate possible differences by gender and nationality.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Blau, G. (2003). Testing for a four-dimensional structure of occupational commitment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 469.
 
2
Hansen, C. D. (1995). Occupational cultures: Whose frame are we using? The Journal for Quality and Participation, 18(3), 60.
 
3
Douglas, M. (1982). Introduction to grid/group analysis. In M. Douglas (Ed.), Essays in the Sociology of Perception. London: Routledge.
4
 
5
Friedman, T, (2002). India, Pakistan, and GE. New York Times, (August, 11), 13.
6
 
7
Guzman, I. R., Sharif, R. M., Blanchard, T. J., Ellis, G. S., & Stanton, J. M. (2005). What attracts women to the IT field? The First Process of Occupational Socialization. Paper presented at the 2005 Americas Conference on Information Systems, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
 
8
Guzman, I. R. (2006). "As you like I.T.": Occupational Subculture and Commitment of New Information Technologists. Dissertation Syracuse University, Syracuse.
 
9
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. Garden City, NY.: Anchor Press.
 
10
Lee, K., Carswell, J., & Allen, N. (2000). A meta-analitic review of Occupational Commitment: Relations with person and work-related variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538--551.
 
11
Mencil, J. (2005). Multipotentiality In The Workplace: Person-Environment Fit, Occupational Outcomes, And Emotional Intelligence.Unpublished manuscript.
 
12
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61--89.
 
13
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and Extension and Test of a Three-component Conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538.
 
14
Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E., & Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee Commitment and Motivation: A Conceptual Analysis and Integrative Model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 991.
 
15
O'Reilly, C., III, & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational Commitment and Psychological Attachment: The Effects of Compliance, Identification, and Internalization on Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492.
 
16
Orlikowski, W.J., and Baroudi, J.J. (1989). The information systems profession: myth or reality. Office: Technology & People, 4, 1, 13--30.
17
18
 
19
UNDP Human Development Report 2001 "Making new technologies work for human development" retrieved on Dec. 2005 at: http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2001/en/
 
20
Trice, H. (1993). Occupational Subcultures in the Workplace. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
 
21
Witt, L. A. (1993). Reactions to work assignment as predictors of organizational commitment: The moderating effect of occupational identification. Journal of Business Research, 26(1), 17--30.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Indira R. Guzman: colleagues
Damien Joseph: colleagues
K. N. Papamichail: colleagues
Jeffrey M. Stanton: colleagues