ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Managing technology use and learning in nonprofit community organizations: methodological challenges and opportunities
Full text PdfPdf (326 KB)
Source Computer Human Interaction for the Management of Information Technology archive
Proceedings of the 2007 symposium on Computer human interaction for the management of information technology table of contents
Cambridge, Massachusetts
SESSION: Technology and use table of contents
Article No. 8  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:1-59593-635-6
Authors
Cecelia Merkel  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Umer Farooq  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Lu Xiao  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Craig Ganoe  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Mary Beth Rosson  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
John M. Carroll  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 172,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1234772.1234783
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We are investigating how to empower nonprofit community organizations to develop the information technology management practices required to carry out their civic goals. We highlight our methodology of working with nonprofit organizations through three case examples from the field. These examples illustrate that nonprofit organizations are able to and can indeed sustain their IT management practices through various methodological techniques. These techniques---such as scenario development, technology inventory assessment, and volunteer management practices---emphasize the importance of long-term critical planning and design skills. Based on our fieldwork, we enumerate lessons that may be valuable for community stakeholders, designers, researchers, and practitioners.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ackerman, M. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 2--3 (2000), 181--205.
 
2
Balka, E. Political frameworks for system design: Participatory design in nonprofit women's organizations in Canada and the United States. In J. Gaertner & I. Wagner, (Eds.), Workshop Proceedings: Political Frameworks of System Design From a Cross-Cultural Perspective. Held in conjunction with the Third Decennial Conference: Computers in Context: Joining Forces in Design (Aarhus, Denmark, August 1995) URL: http://www.sfu.ca/~ebalka/aarhus.htm.
 
3
Benston, M. and Balka, E. Participatory design by nonprofit organizations. In Proceedings of the Conference on Participatory Design (PDC '90) (Seattle, Washington, March/April 1990). CPSR, Palo Alto, CA, 1995, 107--113.
 
4
Berlinger, L. and Te'eni, D. Leader's Attitudes and Computer Use in Religious Congregations. Non-profit Management and Leadership, 9, 4 (1999), 399--411.
5
6
 
7
Burt, E. and Taylor, J. A. Information and communication technologies: Reshaping voluntary organizations? Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 11, (2 (2000), 131--143.
 
8
Carroll, J. M. Participatory design of community information systems: The designer as bard. In F. Darses, R. Dieng, C. Simone, & M. Zacklad (Eds.), Cooperative Systems Design (COOP '04). IOS Press, Washington DC, 2004, 1--6.
9
 
10
Corder, K. Acquiring New Technology: Comparing Nonprofit and Public Sector Agencies. Administration & Society, 33, 2 (May 2001), 194--219.
 
11
Dubé, L. and Paré, G. Rigor in information systems positivist case research: current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 27, 4 (2003), 597--635.
 
12
Eisinger, P. Organizational Capacity and Organizational Effectiveness Among Street-Level Food Assistance Programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31 (March 2002), 115--130.
 
13
 
14
Gilbert, M. C. Disconnected: The First Nonprofit Email Survey. Gilbert Research Center, August 2001. URL: http://research.gilbert.org/nes/disconnected/.
 
15
 
16
King, N. Social capital and nonprofit leaders. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14, 4 (2004), 471--486.
17
18
 
19
 
20
Merkel, C., Clitherow, M., Farooq, U., Xiao, L., Ganoe, C. H., Carroll, J. M., and Rosson, M. B. Sustaining computer use and learning in community computing contexts: Making technology part of who they are and what they do. The Journal of Community Informatics {online}, 1, 2 (2005), URL: http://ci-journal.net/viewarticle.php?id=53.
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
Rosson, M. B. and Carroll, J. M. Minimalist Design for Informal Learning in Community Computing. In Proceedings of the Communities and Technology Conference (C&T '05) (Milano, Italy, June 13--16, 2005). Springer, Netherlands, 75--94.
 
25
Salamon L. M., Sokolowki, S. W., and List, R. Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project: Global Civil Society At-a-Glance. Institute for Policy Studies, Center for Civil Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, 2003.
 
26
 
27
Slack, R. Community and Technology: Social Learning in CCIS. In M. Gurstein (Ed.), Community Informatics: Enabling Communities with Information and Communications Technologies, 2000, 494--515.
 
28
Suchman, L. A. Practice-based design of information systems: Notes from the hyperdeveloped world. The Information Society, 18 (2002), 139--144.
 
29
 
30
Trigg, R. H. From sandbox to "fundbox": Weaving participatory design into the fabric of a busy nonprofit. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC '00) (New York, NY, November 28-December 1, 2000). CPSR, Palo Alto, California, 2000, 174--183.
31
 
32
Yin, R. K. Case study research: design and methods. Sage, 2003.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Cecelia Merkel: colleagues
Umer Farooq: colleagues
Lu Xiao: colleagues
Craig Ganoe: colleagues
Mary Beth Rosson: colleagues
John M. Carroll: colleagues