ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Practical variation-aware interconnect delay and slew analysis for statistical timing verification
Full text PdfPdf (267 KB)
Source International Conference on Computer Aided Design archive
Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/ACM international conference on Computer-aided design table of contents
San Jose, California
SESSION: Variation modeling table of contents
Pages: 54 - 59  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN ~ ISSN:1092-3152 , 1-59593-389-1
Authors
Xiaoji Ye  Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Peng Li  Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Frank Liu  IBM Austin Research Lab, Austin, TX
Sponsors
IEEE-CS : Computer Society
IEEE-CAS : Circuits & Systems
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 28,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1233501.1233513
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Interconnects constitute a dominant source of circuit delay for modern chip designs. The variations of critical dimensions in modern VLSI technologies lead to variability in interconnect performance that must be fully accounted for in timing verification. However, handling a multitude of inter-die/intra-die variations and assessing their impacts on circuit performance can dramatically complicate the timing analysis. In this paper, a practical interconnect delay and slew analysis technique is presented to facilitate efficient evaluation of wire performance variability. By harnessing a collection of computationally efficient procedures and closed-form formulas, process and input signal variations are directly mapped into the variability of the output delay and slew. Since our approach produces delay and slew expressions parameterized in the underlying process variations, it can be harnessed to enable statistical timing analysis while considering important statistical correlations. Our experimental results have indicated that the presented analysis is accurate regardless of location of sink nodes and it is also robust over a wide range of process variations.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
L. Pillage and R. Rohrer. Asymptotic waveform evaluation for timing analysis. IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, 9:352--366, April 1990.
 
2
S. Nassif. Modeling and analysis of manufacturing variations. In Proc. IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conf., pages 223--228, 2001.
 
3
L. Daniel, O. Siong, L. Chay, K. Lee, and J. White. A multi-parameter moment-matching model-reduction approach for generating geometrically parameterized interconnect performance models. IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, 23(5):678--693, May 2004.
 
4
5
 
6
7
 
8
C. Alpert, A. Devgan, and C. Kashyap. Rc delay metrics for performance optimization. IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, 20:571--582, May 2001.
 
9
C. Kashyap, J. Alpert, F. Liu, and A. Devgan. Closed-form expressions for extending step delay and slew metrics to ramp inputs for rc trees. IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, 23, April 2004.
 
10
C. Ratzlaff and L. Pillage. Rice: rapid interconnect circuit evaluation using awe. IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, 13(6):763--776, June 1994.
11
 
12
H. B. Bakoglu. Circuits, interconnections and packaging for VLSI. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990.
13