ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Modeling malcode with Hephaestus: beyond simple spread
Full text PdfPdf (967 KB)
Source ACM Southeast Regional Conference archive
Proceedings of the 45th annual southeast regional conference table of contents
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
SESSION: Papers table of contents
Pages: 379 - 384  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-629-5
Authors
Attila Ondi  Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL
Richard Ford  Florida Institution of Technology, Melbourne, FL
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 16,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1233341.1233410
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Realistic modeling of worm spread is crucial if we wish to predict the real-world efficacy of different worm counter-measures. Ideally, such modeling should be able to handle different types of malcode, multiple defenses, and realistic network topologies and limitations. Due to the complexity of the interactions between entities in the network, accurate analytical solutions are extremely difficult to derive. A more tractable approach to the problem is Monte-Carlo simulation. Most such simulators are custom built to simulate the spread of a particular worm and are not easily extendible to other malcode or topology simulations. While general purpose simulators, like GTNetS or ns2, are capable of simulating arbitrary network topologies and actors, they are too granular for our purposes and therefore too CPU intensive for large network simulation. To overcome these limitations, we designed Hephaestus, a simulator which is capable of simulating arbitrary network and application topologies and custom actors. We validate our simulator by modeling the well known spread of the worm, Code-Red I v2. Finally, we conclude by discussing the potential for future work based upon our simulator.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Avalos, P. Hellard, and J.-C. Chatard. Modeling the training-performance relationship using a mixed model in elite swimmers. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 35(5):838--846, May 2003.
 
2
 
3
Z. Chen, L. Gao, and K. Kwait. Modeling the spread of active worms. Twenty-Second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, 3:1890--1900, March 2003.
 
4
J. O. Kephart and S. R. White. Directed-graph epidemiological models of computer viruses. In Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy, pages 343--359, 1991.
 
5
D. Moore and C. Shannon. Caida analysis of code-red, 2001. http://www.caida.org/analysis/security/code-red/.
6
7
 
8
 
9
C. B. Shirey. Modeling the spread and prevention of malicious mobile code via simulation. Master's thesis, Florida Institute of Technology, 2004.
 
10
 
11
 
12
13
 
14
T. Vogt. Simulating and optimising worm propagation algorithms. Technical report, Security Focus, 2003.
 
15
S. Wei, J. Mirkovic, and M. Swany. Distributed worm simulation with a realistic internet model. In Proceedings of the 2005 Symposium on Modelling and Simulation of Malware, 2005.
 
16
M. M. Williamson and J. Lévillé. An epidemiological model of virus spread and cleanup. In Proceedings of the Virus Bulletin Conference, 2003.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Attila Ondi: colleagues
Richard Ford: colleagues