ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A tentative proposal: improving information assurance risk analysis models for small- and medium-sized enterprises through adoption of an open development model
Full text PdfPdf (31 KB)
Source Information security curriculum development archive
Proceedings of the 3rd annual conference on Information security curriculum development table of contents
Kennesaw, Georgia
SESSION: Practice table of contents
Pages: 194 - 196  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-437-5
Authors
John C. Beachboard  Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho
Alma Cole  NIATEC, Pocatello, Idaho
Mike Mellor  NIATEC, Pocatello, Idaho
Steven Hernandez  NIATEC, Pocatello, Idaho
Kregg Aytes  Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho
Nelson Massad  Florida Atlantic University, Jupiter, Florida
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 73,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1231047.1231073
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Despite the availability of numerous methods and publications concerning the proper conduct of information security risk analyses, "there is a relative dearth of insights that help firms to understand the socio-organizational challenges of managing the deployment and use of these tools to prevent IS security compromises" [3, p. 3627]. This paper builds a case for then briefly outlines a possible approach for developing an "open development" strategy to address recognized deficiencies in the area of risk analysis. This is an abbreviated version of a longer paper that describes the identified initiatives in greater detail. For a complete version of this paper, please contact the first author.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Mooney, J., Chun, M., Hovav, A., George, J., & Griffy-Brown, C. (2005). Are prevailing theories and practices of IS security management adequate? An evaluation and call to action. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Americas Conference on Information Systems (p. 3627). Omaha, NE: Association for Information Systems.
 
4
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2002). Special Publication Risk management guide for information technology systems. In 800-30. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
 
5
OCTAVE methods. (2003). Available: http://www.cert.org/octave/methods.html (Accessed 9 February 2006).
 
6
 
7
RiskWatch: Information systems & ISO 1799 2005 Product Sheet. (2005). Available: http://www.riskwatch.com/ProductSheets/RW-IS_Product_Flyer_0705.pdf (Accessed 31 January 2006).
 
8
 
9
Sourceforge.net FAQ. (2006). Available: http://sourceforge.net/docs/about.
 
10

Collaborative Colleagues:
John C. Beachboard: colleagues
Alma Cole: colleagues
Mike Mellor: colleagues
Steven Hernandez: colleagues
Kregg Aytes: colleagues
Nelson Massad: colleagues