ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The effect of network delay on remote calligraphic teaching with haptic interfaces
Full text PdfPdf (192 KB)
Source Network and System Support for Games archive
Proceedings of 5th ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Network and system support for games table of contents
Singapore
SESSION: Distributed/collaborative virtual environments table of contents
Article No. 12  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-589-4
Authors
Kenji Hikichi  Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
Yasuhiko Yasuda  Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
Akifumi Fukuda  University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Kaoru Sezaki  University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Sponsor
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 46,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1230040.1230077
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

For a design of distributed virtual environments (DVEs) system, it is important to clarify the relation between network-level quality of service (QoS) and user-level QoS. This paper examines network QoS problem on a remote calligraphic teaching system with haptics interfaces, where a pair of users (teacher and student) interact directly (not through any virtual objects), and the operation of haptic device of one user is immediately reflected to another user's reaction force. In this system, teacher navigates student to write down the same character on a virtual paper using a constraint force. The constraint force is used to hold the user's stylus of haptic device to follow the remote user's operation. We propose a new method to generate a constraint force, which enables to hold tightly the remote user's stylus with suppressing unexpected vibrations. This system also can show a visual guide, which stands the remote user's information (position of the cursor and writing pressure).

We carried out subjective evaluation on the system for assessing the effect of network delay between teacher and student's hosts. We also compared the effect of force feedback and visual guide in the system to evaluate the role of haptics.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. O. Alhalabi and S. Horiguchi. Network Latency Issue in Cooperative Shared Haptic Virtual Environment. In Third International Conference on Virtual Realtiy and its Application in Industry (VRAI 2002), Hangzhou, China, pages 264--270, Apr. 2002.
2
3
 
4
K. Hikichi, I. Arimoto, K. Sezaki, and Y. Yasuda. Evaluation of Network QoS on Remote Navigation System with Haptic Interface. In Technical Report of IEICE, CQ-2004-66, pages 35--39, July 2004. (in Japanese).
 
5
K. Hikichi, H. Morino, I. Arimoto, I. Fukuda, S. Matsumoto, M. Iijima, K. Sezaki, and Y. Yasuda. Architecture of Haptics Communication System for Adaptation to Network Environments. In Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME2001), FP2.01, Aug. 2001.
 
6
Y. Ishibashi, S. Tasaka, and T. Hasegawa. The virtual-time rendering algorithm for haptic media synchronization in networked virtual environments. In Proc. of IEEE Communications Quality & Reliability International Workshop (CQR 2002), Okinawa, Japan, 2002.
 
7
ITU-R Recommendations. Recommendation 500-10; Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. ITU-R Rec. BT.500-10, Mar. 2000.
 
8
T. H. Massie and J. K. Salisbury. The PHANToM Haptic Interface: A Device for Probing Virtual Objects. In Proc. ASME Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems 1994, in Dynamic System and Control 1994, volume 1, pages 295--301, 1994.
 
9
 
10
SensAble Technologies Inc. GHOST SDK Programmer's Guide Version 3.0, 1999.
 
11


Collaborative Colleagues:
Kenji Hikichi: colleagues
Yasuhiko Yasuda: colleagues
Akifumi Fukuda: colleagues
Kaoru Sezaki: colleagues