ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Model-based evaluation of expert cell phone menu interaction
Full text PdfPdf (377 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) archive
Volume 14 ,  Issue 1  (May 2007) table of contents
Article No. 1  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:1073-0516
Authors
Robert St. Amant  North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Thomas E. Horton  North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Frank E. Ritter  The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 25,   Downloads (12 Months): 309,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1229855.1229856
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We describe concepts to support the analysis of cell phone menu hierarchies, based on cognitive models of users and easy-to-use optimization techniques. We present an empirical study of user performance on five simple tasks of menu traversal on an example cell phone. Two of the models applied to these tasks, based on GOMS and ACT-R, give good predictions of behavior. We use the empirically supported models to create an effective evaluation and improvement process for menu hierarchies. Our work makes three main contributions: a novel and timely study of a new, very common HCI task; new versions of existing models for accurately predicting performance; and a search procedure to generate menu hierarchies that reduce traversal time, in simulation studies, by about a third.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., and Quin, Y. 2004. An integrated theory of the mind. Psych. Rev. 111, 4, 1036--1060.
 
2
Byrne, M. D. 2001. ACT-R/PM and menu selection: Applying a cognitive architecture to HCI. Int. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 55, 1, 41--84.
 
3
DiPrima, D. 2006. Cellular market rising above 2.14 billion subscribers. telecombeat.com (http://www.telecombeat.com/content/view/4689).
 
4
Fitts, P. M. 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exper. Psych. 47, 381--391.
 
5
Gray, W. D., John, B. E., and Atwood, M. E. 1993. Project Ernestine: Validating a GOMS analysis for predicting and explaining real-world task performance. Human-Comput. Interac. 8, 3, 237--309.
 
6
7
 
8
John, B. E. 2003. Information processing and skilled behavior. In HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks, J. M. Carroll, Ed. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, CA.
9
10
11
 
12
Kieras, D. 1999. A Guide to GOMS Model Usability Evaluation using GOMSL and GLEAN3. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
 
13
 
14
Kieras, D. and Meyer, D. E. 1997. An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 12, 4, 391--438.
 
15
MacKenzie, I. S. 2003. Motor behavior models for human-computer interaction. In HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks, J. M. Carroll, Ed. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, CA.
16
 
17
 
18
19
 
20
Pirolli, P. 2003. Exploring and finding information. In HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks, J. M. Carroll, Ed. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, CA.
 
21
Pogue, D. 2005. The cellphone that does everything imaginable, at least sort of. The New York Times, May 12, 2005.
 
22
Ritter, F. E. 1991. Towards fair comparisons of connectionist algorithms through automatically generated parameter sets. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. 877-881.
23
 
24
Ritter, F. E., Haynes, S. R., Cohen, M., Howes, A., John, B., Best, B., Lebiere, C., Jones, R. M., Crossman, J., Lewis, R. L., St. Amant, R., McBride, S. P., Urbas, L., Leuchter, S., and Vera, A. 2006. High-level behavior representation languages revisited. In Proceedings of ICCM---2006---Seventh International Conference on Cognitive Modeling. D. Fum, F. del Missier and A. Stocco, Eds. Edizioni Goliardiche, Trieste, Italy, 404--407.
 
25
Ritter, F. E. and Young, R. M. 2001. Embodied models as simulated users: Introduction to this special issue on using cognitive models to improve interface design. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 55, 1, 1--14.
 
26
St. Amant, R., Freed, A., and Ritter, F. E. 2004a. Specifying ACT-R models of user interaction with a GOMS language. Cog. Syst. Res. 6, 1, 71--88.
27
 
28
Salvucci, D. 2001. Predicting the effects of in-car interface use on driver performance: An integrated model approach. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 55, 1, 85--107.
29
30
 
31
Young, R. M. 1998. Rational analysis of exploratory choice. In Rational models of cognition, M. Oaksford & N. Chater, Eds. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 469--500.

CITED BY  7

Collaborative Colleagues:
Robert St. Amant: colleagues
Thomas E. Horton: colleagues
Frank E. Ritter: colleagues