ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Masquerade detection based on SVM and sequence-based user commands profile
Full text PdfPdf (149 KB)
Source ASIAN ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM symposium on Information, computer and communications security table of contents
Singapore
SESSION: Short papers table of contents
Pages: 398 - 400  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:1-59593-574-6
Authors
Jeongseok Seo  Republic of Korea
Sungdeok Cha  Republic of Korea
Sponsor
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 69,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1229285.1229340
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Masqueraders, despite widespread use of security products such as firewalls and intrusion detection systems, are serious threats to organizations. Although anomaly detection techniques have been considered as an effective approach to complement existing security solutions, they are not widely used in practice due to poor accuracy and relatively high degree of false alarms. In this paper, we performed an empirical study investigating the effectiveness of SVM and sequence-based kernel methods. Sequence-based kernel methods showed slightly better performance than generic RBF kernel with same frequency of false alarms. In addition, the composition of two kernel methods showed that frequency of false alarms could be further reduced.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
L. Gordon, M. Loeb, and et al. 2004 CSI/FBI Computer Crime and Security Survey. Computer Security Institute, 2004.
 
4
W. Hu, Y. Liao, and V. Vemuri. Robust support vector machines for anomaly detection in computer security. 2003 Intl. Conf. on Machine Learning and Applications, June 2003.
 
5
 
6
H. Kim and S. Cha. Efficient masquerade detection using svm based on common command frequency in sliding windows. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E87-D(11), November 2004.
 
7
H. Kim and S. Cha. Empirical evaluation of svm-based masquerade detection using unix commands. Computers and Security, 24(2):160--168, March 2005.
 
8
 
9
 
10
S. Mukkamala and A. Sung. Feature ranking and selection for intrusion detection systems using support vector machines. Intl. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Engineering, pages 503--509, 2002.
 
11
M. Schonlau, W. DuMouchel, and et al. Computer intrusion: Detecting masqueraders. Statistical Science, 16(1):58--74, February 2001.
 
12
B. Szymanski and Y. Zhang. Recursive data mining for masquerade detection and author identification. IEEE Information Assurance Workshop, June 2004.
 
13
K. Wang and S. Stolfo. One-class training for masquerade detection. 3rd IEEE Conference Data Mining Workshop on Data Mining for Computer Security, November 2003.
 
14
W. Webster, C. Alexander, and et al. A review of FBI security program. US Dept. of Justice, March 2002.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Jeongseok Seo: colleagues
Sungdeok Cha: colleagues