ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Combinatorial characterizations of authentication codes in verification oracle model
Full text PdfPdf (318 KB)
Source ASIAN ACM Symposium on Information, Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM symposium on Information, computer and communications security table of contents
Singapore
SESSION: Authentication & trust management table of contents
Pages: 183 - 193  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:1-59593-574-6
Authors
Dongvu Tonien  University of Wollongong, Australia
Reihaneh Safavi-Naini  University of Wollongong, Australia
Peter Wild  University of London, United Kingdom
Sponsor
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 39,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1229285.1229311
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We consider unconditionally secure authentication codes where the adversary has access to a verification oracle that when presented with a message query gives a response of 1 or 0 if the query corresponds to an authenticated message or not, respectively.We define two types of attack, offline and online, and their two corresponding games. We define the advantage of the adversary in each game and obtain a lower bound on the maximum advantage when the adversary plays his optimal strategy. For each game, authentication codes that satisfy the lower bounds with equality are said to provide perfect protection and guarantee the minimum success chance for the attacker in the corresponding game. We prove that an optimal code for the offline attack is also an optimal code for the online attack. In both cases, we prove that perfect protection of order i implies perfect protection of order j for j < i and derive a lower bound on the number of keys for an optimal code. Finally we show that the encoding matrix of codes with perfect protection of order i and minimum number of keys correspond to a Steiner system.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Bellare, O. Goldreich and A. Mityagin, The power of verification queries in message authentication and authenticated encryption, Cryptology ePrint Archive: Report 2004/309.
 
2
E. F. Brickell, A few results in message authentication, Congressus Numerantium 43 (1984), 141--154.
 
3
J. L. Carter, M. N. Wegman, Universal classes of hash functions, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 18(2) (1979), pp. 143--154.
 
4
E. N. Gilbert, F. J. MacWilliams and N. J. A. Sloane, Codes which detect deception, Bell System Technical Journal 53 (1974), 405--424.
 
5
J. L. Massey, Cryptography - a selective survey, Alta Frequenza LV (1) (1986), 4--11.
 
6
D. Pei, Information-theoretic bounds for authentication codes and block designs, Journal of Cryptology 8 (1995), 177--188.
 
7
U. Rosenbaum, A lower bound on authentication after having observed a sequence of messages, Journal of Cryptology 6 (1993), 135--156.
 
8
R. Safavi-Naini, L. McAven and M. Yung, General group authentication codes and their relation to "unconditionally-secure signatures", PKC'04, LNCS 2947, 231--247.
 
9
R. Safavi-Naini and P. Wild, Bounds on authentication systems in query model, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Information Theory Workshop on Theory and Practice in Information-Theoretic Security, 85--91, 2005.
 
10
 
11
A. Sgarro, Information-theoretic bounds for authentication frauds, Journal of Computer Security 2 (1993), 53--63.
 
12
G. J. Simmons, Message authentication: a game on hypergraphs, Congressus Numerantium 45 (1984), 161--192.
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17

Collaborative Colleagues:
Dongvu Tonien: colleagues
Reihaneh Safavi-Naini: colleagues
Peter Wild: colleagues