ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in Web search
Full text PdfPdf (267 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) archive
Volume 25 ,  Issue 2  (April 2007) table of contents
Article No. 7  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:1046-8188
Authors
Thorsten Joachims  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Laura Granka  Google Inc., Mountain View, CA
Bing Pan  College of Charleston, Charleston, SC
Helene Hembrooke  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Filip Radlinski  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Geri Gay  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 25,   Downloads (12 Months): 346,   Citation Count: 29
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1229179.1229181
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This article examines the reliability of implicit feedback generated from clickthrough data and query reformulations in World Wide Web (WWW) search. Analyzing the users' decision process using eyetracking and comparing implicit feedback against manual relevance judgments, we conclude that clicks are informative but biased. While this makes the interpretation of clicks as absolute relevance judgments difficult, we show that relative preferences derived from clicks are reasonably accurate on average. We find that such relative preferences are accurate not only between results from an individual query, but across multiple sets of results within chains of query reformulations.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
 
5
Belew, R. 2000. Finding Out About. Cambridge, University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
 
6
Boyan, J., Freitag, D., and Joachims, T. 1996. A machine learning architecture for optimizing Web search engines. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Internet Based Information Systems. 1--8.
7
 
8
Brumby, D. and Howes, A. 2003. Interdependence and past-experience in menu choice assessment. In Poster presented at the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
 
9
Brumby, D. and Howes, A. 2004. Good enough but I'll just check: Web-page search as attentional refocusing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cognitive Modeling.
10
11
 
12
Cohen, W., Shapire, R., and Singer, Y. 1999. Learning to order things. J. Artific. Intell. Res. 10, 243--270.
 
13
Crammer, K. and Singer, Y. 2001. Pranking with ranking. In Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS).
14
 
15
16
17
18
19
20
 
21
Herbrich, R., Graepel, T., and Obermayer, K. 2000. Large margin rank boundaries for ordinal regression. In Advances in Large Margin Classifiers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 115--132.
 
22
Holland, S., Ester, M., and Kieling, W. 2003. Preference mining: A novel approach on mining user preferences for personalized applications. In Proceedings of the Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (PKDD). 204--216.
 
23
Hutchinson, W. and Alba, J. 1991. Ignoring irrelevant information: Situational determinats of consumer learning. J. Consum. Res. 18, 325--345.
 
24
25
 
26
Joachims, T., Freitag, D., and Mitchell, T. 1997. WebWatcher: A tour guide for the World Wide Web. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). Vol. 1. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 770--777.
27
28
 
29
Just, M. and Carpenter, P. 1980. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psycholog. Rev. 87, 329--354.
30
31
 
32
33
34
 
35
Lieberman, H. 1995. Letizia: An agent that assists Web browsing. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI '95). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 924--929.
 
36
Mantell, S. and Kardes, F. 1999. The role of direction of comparison, attribute-based processing, and attitude-based processing in consumer preference. J. Consum. Res. 25, 335--352.
 
37
 
38
Oard, D. and Kim, J. 1998. Implicit feedback for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Recommender Systems. 81--83.
39
40
 
41
Rayner, K. 1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psycholog. Bull. 124, 372--252.
 
42
Salogarvi, J., Kojo, I., Jaana, S., and Kaski, S. 2003. Can relevance be inferred from eye movements in information retrieval? In Proceedings of the Workshop on Self-Organizing Maps. 261--266.
 
43
Samuelson, P. 1948. Consumption theory in terms of revealed preferences. Econometrica 15, 243--253.
44
45
 
46
Teevan, J., Dumais, S., and Horvitz, E. 2005. Beyond the commons: Investigating the value of personalizing Web search. In Proceedings of the Workshop on New Technologies for Personalized Information Access (PIA). 84--92.
 
47
Varian, H. 1992. Microeconomic Analysis. Noron, New York, NY.
 
48
49

CITED BY  29

Collaborative Colleagues:
Thorsten Joachims: colleagues
Laura Granka: colleagues
Bing Pan: colleagues
Helene Hembrooke: colleagues
Filip Radlinski: colleagues
Geri Gay: colleagues