ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Some inconsistencies and misnomers in probabilistic information retrieval
Full text PdfPdf (477 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 14th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Pages: 57 - 61  
Year of Publication: 1991
ISBN:0-89791-448-1
Author
William S. Cooper  School of Library and Information Studies, University of California, Berkeley, California
Sponsors
AICA : Assoc Italianai de Calcolo Automatico
BCS-IRSG : BCS/Information Retrieval Specialist Group
German Comp Soc : GI - Gesellshaft for Informatik
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
INRIA : Institut Natl de Recherche en Info et en Automatique
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 26,   Citation Count: 20
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/122860.122866
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Cooper, W. S. Exploiting the maximum entropy principle to increase retrieval effectiveness. Journal of the American Sociely for information Science, 34(1): 31-39; 1983.
 
2
Cooper, W. S.; Huizinga, P. The maximum entropy principle and its application to the design of probabilistic retrieval systems. Information Technology: Research and Development, 1(2): 99-112; 1982.
 
3
Eels, E. Rational Decisions and Causality. Cambridge University Press. 1982.
4
 
5
Harper, D. J.; Van Rijsbergen, C. J. An evaluation of feedback in document retrieval using co-occurrence data. Journal of Documentation, 34(3): 189-216; 1978.
 
6
Kantor, P. Maximum entropy and the optimal design of automated information retrieval systems. Information Technology: Research and Development, 3(2): 88-94; 1984.
 
7
Lee, J. J.; Kantor, P. A study of probabilistic information retrieval systems in the case of inconsistent expert judgement. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(3), 1990.
 
8
9
 
10
Miller, W. H. A probabilistic search strategy for Medlars. Journal of Documentation, 27: 254-266; 1971.
 
11
Robertson, S. E. Specificity and weighted retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 30: 41-46; 1974.
 
12
Robertson, S. E.; Bovey, J. D. Statistical problems in the application of probabilistic models to information retrieval. British Library Research and Development Department, Report No. 5739; 1982.
 
13
Robertson, S. E.; Maron, M. E.; Cooper, W. S. Probability of relevance: A unification of two competing models for document retrieval. Information Technology: Research and Development, 1(1): 1- 21; 1982.
 
14
Robertson, S. E.; Sparck Jones, K. Relevance weighting of search terms.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(3): 129-146; 1976.
 
15
 
16
Yu, C.T.; Buckley, C.; Lam, H.; Salton, G. A generalized term dependence model in information retrieval. Information Technology" Research and Development, 2: 129-154; 1983.
17

CITED BY  20