A formal study of distributed meeting scheduling

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

A formal study of distributed meeting scheduling: preliminary results

Full text

Pdf (1.54 MB)

Source

Conference on Supporting Group Work archive
Proceedings of the conference on Organizational computing systems table of contents

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Pages: 55 - 68

Year of Publication: 1991

ISBN:0-89791-456-2

Also published in ...

Authors

Sandip Sen	Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Edmund H. Durfee	Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Sponsor

SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 3, Downloads (12 Months): 19, Citation Count: 5

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/122831.122837 What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Thomas L. Casavant , Jon G. Kuhl, A Communicating Finite Automata Approach to Modeling Distributed Computation and its Application to Distributed Decision-Making, IEEE Transactions on Computers, v.39 n.5, p.628-639, May 1990 [doi>10.1109/12.53576]
	2	S. E. Conry, K. Kuwabara, V. R. Lesser, and R. A. Meyer. Multistage negotiation for distributed constraint satisfaction, iEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 21(6), December 1991. (Special Issue on Distributed AI).
	3	Susan E. Conry , Robert A. Meyer , Victor R. Lesser, Multistage negotiation in distributed planning, Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1988
	4	E. H. Durfee , V. R. Lesser , D. D. Corkill, Trends in Cooperative Distributed Problem Solving, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, v.1 n.1, p.63-83, March 1989 [doi>10.1109/69.43404]
	5	Edmund H. Durfee and Thomas A. Montgomery. A hierarchical protocol for coordinating multiagent behaviors. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial intelligence, pages 86-93, July 1990.
	6	Edmund H. Durfee and Thomas A. Montgomery. Coordination as distributed search in a hierarchical behavior space. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 21(6), December 1991. (Special Issue on Distributed AI).
	7	Martha S. Feldman, Electronic mail and weak ties in organizations, Office Technology and People, v.3 n.2, p.83-101, August 1, 1987 [doi>10.1108/eb022643]
	8	Irene Greif. PCAL: A personal calendar. Technical Report TM-213, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, Cambridge, Mass, 1982.
	9	Jonathan Grudin. Social evaluation of the user interface: Who does the work and who gets the benefit? In H. Bullinger and B. Shacketl, editors, Human Computer Interaction- INTERA CT87. North Holland, 1987.
	10	Carl Hewitt and Jeff Inman. DAI betwixt and between: From "intelligent agents" to open systems science. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 21(6), December 1991. (Special Issue on Distributed AI).
	11	J. F. Kelley and A. Chapanis. How professional persons keep their calendars' Implications for computerization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 55:141-156, 1982.
	12	Christine M. Kincaid , Pierre B. Dupont , A. R. Kaye, Electronic calendars in the office: an assessment of user needs and current technology, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.3 n.1, p.89-102, Jan. 1985 [doi>10.1145/3864.3868]
	13	Thomas W Malone , Kenneth R Grant , Franklyn A Turbak , Stephen A Brobst , Michael D Cohen, Intelligent information-sharing systems, Communications of the ACM, v.30 n.5, p.390-402, May 1987 [doi>10.1145/22899.22903]
	14	Jeff Y-C Pan and Jay M. Tenenbaum. An intelligent agent framework for enterprise integration. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 21(6), December 1991. (Special Issue on Distributed AI).
	15	Reid G. Smith. The contract net protocol: Highlevel communication and control in a distributed problem solver. IEEE Transactions on Computers, C- 29(12):1104-1113, December 1980.
	16	Kazuo Sugihara , Tohru Kikuno , Noriyoshi Yoshida, A meeting scheduler for office automation, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.15 n.10, p.1147-1156, October 1989 [doi>10.1109/TSE.1989.559761]

CITED BY 5

	Susan E. Lander , Victor R. Lesser, Sharing Metainformation to Guide Cooperative Search Among Heterogeneous Reusable Agents, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, v.9 n.2, p.193-208, March 1997
	Kazuhiro Tsuchiya , Yoshiyasu Takefuji, A Neural Network Parallel Algorithm for Meeting Schedule Problems, Applied Intelligence, v.7 n.3, p.205-213, July 1997
	Rajiv T. Maheswaran , Milind Tambe , Emma Bowring , Jonathan P. Pearce , Pradeep Varakantham, Taking DCOP to the Real World: Efficient Complete Solutions for Distributed Multi-Event Scheduling, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, p.310-317, July 19-23, 2004, New York, New York
	F. Wang, Adaptive Meeting Scheduling for Large-Scale Distributed Groupware, BT Technology Journal, v.21 n.4, p.138-145, 2003
	Alejandro Zunino , Marcelo Campo, Chronos: A multi-agent system for distributed automatic meeting scheduling, Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal, v.36 n.3, p.7011-7018, April, 2009