ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The impact of research on middleware technology
Full text PdfPdf (574 KB)
Source ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review archive
Volume 41 ,  Issue 1  (January 2007) table of contents
COLUMN: Individual submissions table of contents
Pages: 89 - 112  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:0163-5980
Authors
Wolfgang Emmerich  UCL, London, UK
Mikio Aoyama  Nanzan University, Seto, Japan
Joe Sventek  University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 78,   Downloads (12 Months): 406,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1228291.1228310
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The middleware market represents a sizable segment of the overall Information and Communication Technology market. In 2005, the annual middleware license revenue was reported by Gartner to be in the region of 8.5 billion US Dollars. In this article we address the question whether research had any involvement in the creation of the technology that is being sold in this market? We attempt a scholarly discourse. We present the research method that we have applied to answer this question. We then present a brief introduction into the key middleware concepts that provide the foundation for this market. It would not be feasible to investigate any possible impact that research might have had. Instead we select a few very successful technologies that are representative for the middleware market as a whole and show the existence of impact of research results in the creation of these technologies. We investigate the origins of web services middleware, distributed transaction processing middleware, message oriented middleware, distributed object middleware and remote procedure call systems. For each of these technologies we are able to show ample influence of research and conclude that without the research conducted by PhD students and researchers in university computer science labs at Brown, CMU, Cambridge, Newcastle, MIT, Vrije, and University of Washington as well as research in industrial labs at APM, AT&T Bell Labs, DEC Systems Research, HP Labs, IBM Research and Xerox PARC we would not have middleware technology in its current form. We summarise the article by distilling lessons that can be learnt from this evidenced impact for future technology transfer undertakings.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
G. Almes. The Impact of Language and System on Remote Procedure Call Design. In Proc. of the 6th Int. Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pages 414--421. IEEE CS Press, 1986.
 
2
G. T. Almes, A. P. Black, E. D. Lazowska, and J. D. Noe. The Eden system: A Technical Overview. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 11(1):43--58, Jan. 1985.
 
3
G. Alonso, D. Agrawal, A. E. Abbadi, M. Kamath, R. Gunthor, and C. Mohan. Advanced Transaction Models in Workflow Contexts. Research report, IBM Research, IBM Almaden, July 1995.
 
4
 
5
W. Andreas. HyperDesk's response to the ORB RFP. OMG TC Document 91.1.6, Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA, USA, Jan. 1991.
 
6
T. Andrews, F. Curbera, H. Dholakia, Y. Goland, J. Klein, F. Leymann, K. Liu, D. Roller, D. Smith, S. Thatte, I. Trickovic, and S. Weerawarana. Business process execution language for web services version 1.1. Technical report, OASIS, ifr.sap.com/bpel4ws, May 2003.
 
7
ANSA. The Advanced Network Systems Architecture (ANSA). Reference manual, Architecture Project Management, Castle Hill, Cambridge, UK, 1989.
 
8
M. P. Atkinson, F. Bancilhon, D. DeWitt, K. Dittrich, D. Maier, and S. Zdonik. The Object-Oriented Database System Manifesto. In W. Kim, J.-M. Nicholas, and S. Nishio, editors, Proc. of the 1 st International Conference on Deductive and Object-Oriented Databases, Kyoto, Japan, pages 223--240. North-Holland, 1990.
 
9
J. M. Bacon and K. G. Hamilton. Distributed Computing with the RPC: the Cambridge Approach. In Distributed Processing, pages 355--369. IFIP, North-Holland, 1988.
 
10
H. E. Bal. The Shared Data Object Model as a Paradigm for Programming Distributed Systems. PhD thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1989.
 
11
 
12
R. Balter. Bull's response to the ORB RFP. OMG TC Document 91.1.5, Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA, USA, Jan. 1991.
 
13
R. Balzer. Living in the Next Generation Operating System. IEEE Software, pages 77--85, 1987.
14
15
16
 
17
 
18
19
20
21
 
22
P. V. Birron, K. Permanente, and A. Malhotra. XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes. Technical report, World Wide Web Consortium, Oct. 2004.
 
23
 
24
 
25
D. Box. A Brief History of SOAP. webservices.xml.com/pub/a/ws/2001/04/04/soap.html, 2001.
 
26
D. Box, D. Ehnebuske, G. Kakivaya, A. Layman, N. Mendelson, H. F. Nielsen, S. Thatte, and D. Winer. Simple object access protocol (soap) 1.1. Note, World Wide Web Consortium, www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/, May 2000.
 
27
T. Bray, J. Paoli, and C. M. Sperberg-McQueen. Extensible Markup Language. Recommendation www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210, World Wide Web Consortium, Mar. 1998.
 
28
M. R. Cagan. The HP SoftBench Environment: An Architecture for a New Generation of Software Tools. Hewlett-Packard Journal, pages 36--47, June 1990.
 
29
A. Chandor, editor. Dictonary of Computers. Penguin Books, 1970.
 
30
 
31
D. R. Cheriton. The V Kernel: A Software Base for Distributed Systems. IEEE Software, 1(2):19--42, 1984.
32
 
33
S. Cheung. Java Transaction Service (JTS). Sun Microsystems, 901 San Antonio Road, Palo Alto, CA 94303, Dec. 1999.
 
34
S. Cheung and V. Matena. Java Transaction API (JTA). Sun Microsystems, 901 San Antonio Road, Palo Alto, CA 94303, Apr. 1999.
 
35
R. Chinnici, M. Gudgin, J.-J. Moreau, J. Schlimmer, and S. Weerawarana. Web services description language (wsdl) 2.0. Working draft, World Wide Web Consortium, www.w3.org/TR/wsd120, Aug. 2004.
 
36
E. Christensen, F. Curbera, G. Meredith, and S. Weerawarana. Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1. W3c note, W3C, March 2001.
 
37
J. Clark and S. DeRose. XML Path Language (XPath) Version 1.0. Recommendation www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xpath-19991116, World Wide Web Consortium, Nov. 1999.
 
38
 
39
J. M. Correira and F. Biscotti. Market Share: AIM and Portal Software, Worldwide, 2005. Gartner market research report, Gartner, June 2006.
 
40
 
41
F. Curbera, S. Weerawarana, and M. J. Duftler. Network accessible service specification language: An xml language for describing network accessible services. Technical report, IBM Research, apps.alphaworks.ibm.com/technologies/soap4j/nassl.pdf, May 2000.
 
42
L. DeMichiel and M. Keith. Enterprise Java Beans Version 3.0: EJB Core Contracts and Requirements. JSR 220, Sun Microsystems, 4140 Network Circle, Santa Clara, CA 95054, Dec. 2005.
43
 
44
F. DeRemer and H. Kron. Programming-in-the-large versus programming-in-the-small. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-2(2):80--86, 1976.
 
45
T. H. Dineen, P. J. Leach, N. W. Mishkin, J. N. Pato, and G. L. Wyant. The Network Computing Architecture and System: An Environment for Developing Distributed Applications. In Proc. of the 1987 Summer USENIX Conference, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, pages 385--398. USENIX Association, Berkeley, CAL, 1987.
 
46
 
47
 
48
W. Emmerich. Engineering Distributed Objects. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, April 2000.
 
49
 
50
C. Enright. Software AG's response to the ORB RFP. OMG TC Document 91.1.10, Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA, USA, Jan. 1991.
51
 
52
J. Fancey. Build Better Business Processes with Web Services in BizTalk Server 2004. MSDN Magazine, 20(3), Mar. 2005.
 
53
M. Fleury and F. Reverbel. The JBoss Extensible Server. In M. Endler and D. C. Schmidt, editors, Proc. of the ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Middleware Conference 2003, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, volume 2672 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 344 - 373. Springer, 2003.
 
54
L. Freburger. DEC response to the ORB RFP. OMG TC Document 91.1.7, Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA, USA, Jan. 1991.
55
 
56
M. Gilpin. Market overview update: Application server market. Technical report, Forrester Research, May 2002.
 
57
58
 
59
 
60
 
61
R. Grimes. DCOM Programming. Wrox, 1997.
 
62
M. Gudgin, M. Hadley, N. Mendelsohn, J.-J. Moreau, and H. F. Nielsen. Simple object access protocol (soap). Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium, www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1, June 2003.
 
63
 
64
M. Hapner, R. Burridge, R. Sharma, and J. Fialli. Java Message Service. Sun Microsystems, 2550 Garcia Avenue, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA, Aug. 2001.
 
65
 
66
N. Hazeltine. NCR's response to the ORB RFP. OMG TC Document 91.1.9, Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA, USA, Jan. 1991.
 
67
R. Heffner, L. Fulton, A. Cullen, M. Gilpin, and H. Peyret. Service Oriented Architectures. Technical report, Forrester Research, www.forrester.com/Research/Document/Excerpt/0,7211,38503,00.html, 2006.
 
68
A. Herbert. APM's response to the ORB RFP. OMG TC Document 91.1.2, Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA, USA, Jan. 1991.
 
69
 
70
D. Hollingsworth. The Workflow Reference Model Version 1.1. Technical Report TC00-1003, Workflow Management Coalition, 2 Crown Walk, Winchester SO22 5XE, UK, Jan. 1995.
 
71
 
72
IBM. MQSeries - An Introduction into Messaging and Queuing. Technical Report GC33-0805-01, IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN, June 1995.
 
73
ISO 8879. Information processing - Text and Office Systems - Standard Generalized Markup Language SGML. Technical report, International Standards Organisation, 1986.
 
74
 
75
76
 
77
 
78
M. M. Kong. DCE: An Environment for Secure Client/Server Computing. Hewlett-Packard Journal, 46(6):6--15, Dec. 1995.
 
79
80
 
81
F. Leymann. Web Service Flow Language (WSFL). Technical report, IBM, www-4.ibm.com/software/solutions/webservices/pdf/WSFL.pdf, May 2001.
 
82
 
83
F. Leymann and D. Roller. Business Process Management with FlowMark. In Digest of Papers of CompCon Spring '94, pages 230--234. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1994.
 
84
F. Leymann, D. Roller, and M. T. Schmidt. Web Services and Business Process Management. IBM Systems Journal, 41(2):198--211, 2002.
85
 
86
B. Liskov. Primtives for Distributed Computing. ACM Operating Systems Review, 13(5):33--42, Dec. 1980.
87
 
88
B. Liskov and A. Snyder. Exception Handling in CLU. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-5(6):546--558, Nov. 1979.
89
 
90
S. M. Little and S. K. Shrivastava. An Examination of the Transition of the Arjuna Distributed Transaction Processing Software from Research to Products. In Proc. of the 2nd Int. Workshop on Industrial Experience with Systems Software, Boston, MA (co-located with OSDI '02). Usenix Association, 2002.
 
91
M. Mathews. HP's response to the ORB RFP. OMG TC Document 91.1.4, Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA, USA, Jan. 1991.
92
 
93
P. Merrick and C. Allen. Web Interface Definition Language. Note, World Wide Web Consortium, www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-widl, Sept. 1997.
 
94
 
95
Microsoft. Enterprice Solution Patterns Using Microsoft .NET. Microsoft Press, 2003.
 
96
97
 
98
C. Mohan and D. Dievendorff. Recent Work on Distributed Commit Protocolls, and Recoverable Messaging and Queuing. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 17(1):22--28, 1994.
 
99
 
100
 
101
A. Nadalin, C. Kaler, P. Hallam-Baker, and R. Monzillo. Ws security. Technical report, OASIS, Mar. 2004.
 
102
 
103
Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA 01701, USA. The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification Version 1.0, October 1991.
 
104
Object Management Group, www.omg.org/docs/1993/93-11-16.pdf. Object Transaction Service -- Reponse to the OMG's second RfP, Nov. 1993.
 
105
Object Management Group, www.omg.org/docs/1993/93-11-01.pdf. Transaction Service Proposal, Nov. 1993.
 
106
Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA 01701, USA. The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification Revision 2.0, July 1995.
107
 
108
OMG. CORBA services: Common Object Services Specification, Revised Edition. Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA 01701, USA, December 1998. www.omg.org/docs/formal/98-12/09.pdf.
 
109
OMG. Notification Service. Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA 01701, USA, Jan. 1998.
 
110
Open Group, Reading, UK. DCE Glossary, 1996. www.opengroup.org/dce/info/papers/dceglossary.htm.
 
111
Open Group, editor. DCE 1.1: Remote Procedure Calls. The Open Group, 1997.
 
112
113
 
114
C. Peltz. Web services orchestration and choreography. IEEE Computer, 36(10):46--52, 2003.
 
115
E. Prudhommeaux. XML Protocol Comparison. Technical report, World Wide Web Consortium, www.w3.org/2000/03/29-XML-protocol-matrix, 2000.
 
116
 
117
 
118
B. K. Reid. The Scribe Document Specification Language and its Compiler. In Proc. of the Int. Conference on Research and Trends in Document Preparation Systems, pages 59--62, 1981.
 
119
S. Reiss. Overview of the FIELD Environment. Technical report, Dept. of Computer Science, Brown University, 1987.
 
120
 
121
122
 
123
M. Shapiro. General and per-submission evaluations to responses to the ORB RFP. OMG TC Document 91.5.7, Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA, USA, Aug. 1991.
 
124
M. Shapiro, Y. Gourhant, S. Habert, L. Mosseri, M. Ruffin, and C. Valot. SOS: An object-oriented operating system: assessment and perspectives. Computer Journal, 2(4):287--337, 1989.
 
125
L. Sheffler. Constellation's response to the ORB RFP. OMG TC Document 91.1.3, Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA, USA, Jan. 1991.
 
126
D. Shia. DSET's response to the ORB RFP. OMG TC Document 91.1.1, Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA, USA, Jan. 1990.
 
127
 
128
 
129
D. Skeen. Teknekron's response to the ORB RFP. OMG TC Document 91.1.8, Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA, USA, Jan. 1991.
 
130
D. Skeen. An Information Bus Architecture for Large-Scale Decision-Support Environments. In Proc. of the Winter Usenix Conference, pages 183--195, 1992.
131
 
132
A. Snyder. A Glossary of Common Object-Oriented Terminology. OMG TC Document 90.1.8, Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA, USA, Jan. 1990.
 
133
A. Snyder. Draft OMG Object Model. OMG TC Document 90.1.2, Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA, USA, Jan. 1990.
 
134
R. Soley. ORB RFP Responses: Final submissions. Memorandum to OMG TC ORB Task Force, Feb. 1991. www.omg.org/docs/1991/91-02-02.txt.
 
135
 
136
R. J. Souza and S. P. Miller. Unix and Remote Procedure Calls: A Peaceful Coexistence? In Proc. of the 6th Int. Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, pages 268--277. IEEE CS Press, 1986.
 
137
P. Srinnivasan. An Introduction to Microsoft .NET Remoting Framework. Technical report, Microsoft, Redmont, Washington, USA, July 2001.
 
138
 
139
 
140
 
141
Sun Microsystems. Java Remote Method Invocation Specification, revision 1.50, jdk 1.2 edition, Oct. 1998.
 
142
J. Sventek and W. Andreas. The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification. OMG TC Document 91.8.1, Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA, USA, Aug. 1991.
143
 
144
TechNet. What is RPC? Microsoft, Mar. 2003. technet.microsoft.com.
 
145
S. Thatte. Xlang: Web services for business process design. Technical report, Microsoft, 2001.
 
146
 
147
B. Weber. Object Request Broker Request for Proposals. OMG TC Document 90.10.5, Object Management Group, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA, USA, Oct. 1990. www.omg.org/docs/1990/90-10-05.txt.
 
148
 
149
D. Winer. XML RPC. Technical report, UserLand Software, June 1999. www.xmlrpc.com/spec.
 
150
 
151
A. Wollrath, R. Riggs, and J. Waldo. A Distributed Object Model for the Java System. Usenix Computing Systems, 9(4):265--290, 1996.
 
152
Xerox OPD. Courier: The Remote Procedure Call Protocol, xerox system integration standard 038112 edition, Dec. 1981.
 
153
X/Open Group. Distributed Transaction Processing: The XA Specification. X/Open Company, ISBN 1 872630 24 3, Reading, UK, Dec. 1991.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Wolfgang Emmerich: colleagues
Mikio Aoyama: colleagues
Joe Sventek: colleagues