Moving from cultural probes to agent-oriented requirements engineering

ABSTRACT

The cultural probe approach is becoming a valuable observational method in social contexts. Based on cultural probe work on intergenerational play, this paper proposes a method for moving forward from these results towards a requirements analysis, while retaining valuable aspects of the cultural probe approach, like subjectivity and interpretation. Since requirements elicitation techniques are often determined by the modeling scheme used, we chose the most apparently appropriate modeling scheme for social contexts, the Agent Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE) methodology, ROADMAP. We believe to have contributed the ability to include AOSE in the cycle from cultural probe observation to production of informed technology, reflecting designer motivation and intention, for re-immersion into the situational context. The method facilitates the transition from data collection in social environments via cultural probes to socially oriented requirements analysis for informed technology production.

REFERENCES

• 1: Jaelson Castro , Manuel Kolp , John Mylopoulos, A Requirements-Driven Development Methodology, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, p.108-123, June 04-08, 2001
• 2: Davis, H., Francis, P., Benda, P., Gibbs, M., Howard, S., Vetere, F., Bridging the Intergenerational Divide: Implications of Employing Cultural Probes in Distributed Homes, Conference '04, ACM (2004)
• 3: William W. Gaver , Jacob Beaver , Steve Benford, Ambiguity as a resource for design, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 05-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/642611.642653]
• 4: William W. Gaver , Andrew Boucher , Sarah Pennington , Brendan Walker, Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty, interactions, v.11 n.5, September + October 2004 [doi>10.1145/1015530.1015555]
• 5: Bill Gaver , Tony Dunne , Elena Pacenti, Design: Cultural probes, interactions, v.6 n.1, p.21-29, Jan./Feb. 1999 [doi>10.1145/291224.291235]
• 6: Hemmings, T., Clarke, K., Crabtree, A., Rodden, T. and Rouncefield, M. Probing the Probes, (2002), Proc. 7^th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, (2002), 42--50
• 7: Hilary Hutchinson , Wendy Mackay , Bo Westerlund , Benjamin B. Bederson , Allison Druin , Catherine Plaisant , Michel Beaudouin-Lafon , Stéphane Conversy , Helen Evans , Heiko Hansen , Nicolas Roussel , Björn Eiderbäck, Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 05-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/642611.642616]
• 8: Jones, M. and Marsden, G. Mobile Design Interaction, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., (2006)
• 9: Kjeldskov, J., Gibbs, M., Vetere, F., Howard, S., Pedell, S., Mecoles, K. and Bunyan, M. Using Cultural Probes to Explore Mediated Intimacy, Australian Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), (2005), 102--115
• 10: Juan, T. and Sterling, L. The ROADMAP Meta-model for Intelligent Adaptive Multi-Agent Systems in Open Environment, in Proceedings of the 4^th International Workshop on Agent Oriented Software Engineering, (2003).
• 11: Pei Pei Kuan , Shanika Rarunasekera , Leon Sterling, Improving Goal and Role Oriented Analysis for Agent Based Systems, Proceedings of the 2005 Australian conference on Software Engineering, p.40-47, March 29-April 01, 2005 [doi>10.1109/ASWEC.2005.27]
• 12: Bashar Nuseibeh , Steve Easterbrook, Requirements engineering: a roadmap, Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering, p.35-46, June 04-11, 2000, Limerick, Ireland [doi>10.1145/336512.336523]
• 13: Michael Winikoff , Lin Padgham, Developing Intelligent Agent Systems: A Practical Guide, Halsted Press, New York, NY, 2004
• 14: Prometheus Design Tool (PDT), Version 2.3b, (2005), available at http://www.cs.rmit.edu.au/agents/pdt/, accessed on 20^th May 2006
• 15: REBEL tool, Version 1.0, (2005), instructions available at http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/agentlab/, accessed on May 20^th, 2006
• 16: Rouncefield, M., Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Rodden, T., Chevherst, K., Clarke, K., Dewsbury, G., and Hughes, J. Adapting Cultural Probes to Inform Design in Sensitive Settings, Proc. OzCHI 2003, (2003), Ergonomics Society of Australia, 4--13
• 17: Axel van Lamsweerde, Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering: A Guided Tour, Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, p.249, August 27-31, 2001
• 18: Frank Vetere , Martin R. Gibbs , Jesper Kjeldskov , Steve Howard , Florian 'Floyd' Mueller , Sonja Pedell , Karen Mecoles , Marcus Bunyan, Mediating intimacy: designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA [doi>10.1145/1054972.1055038]
• 19: Frank Vetere , Hilary Davis , Martin R. Gibbs , Peter Francis , Steve Howard, A magic box for understanding intergenerational play, CHI '06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 22-27, 2006, Montréal, Québec, Canada [doi>10.1145/1125451.1125722]
• 20: Stephen Viller , Ian Sommerville, Ethnographically informed analysis for software engineers, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.53 n.1, p.169-196, July 2000 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.2000.0370]
• 21: Michael Wooldridge, Intelligent agents, Multiagent systems: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.m Miscellaneous

Keywords:
agent-oriented software engineering, agents, cultural probes, interaction design, requirements engineering