Take a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the structure of a new elective course at the University of Florida, Artificial Intelligence in Computer Games, which addresses not only the technical aspects of creating realism within computer games, but also the need for more experiences in oral communication. Key elements of this course include the students conducting a majority of the teaching and actively participating in evaluating each other.

REFERENCES

• 1: Barry W. Boehm, Software Engineering Economics, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1981
• 2: The Joint Task Force for Computing Curricula 2005. Computing Curricula 2005. http://www.acm.org/ education/curric_vols/CC2005-March06Final.pdf, 44.
• 3: Computer Science Accreditation Commission of the Computing Sciences Accreditation Board. Criteria for Accrediting Programs in Computer Science in the United States (June 2000, Version 0.8, January 30, 1999). http://www.csab.org/criteria2k_v08.html.
• 4: Lawrence J. Osborne, Thinking, speaking, and writing for freshmen, Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 03-05, 2006, Houston, Texas, USA
• 5: Mark Michael, Fostering and assessing communication skills in the computer science context, Proceedings of the thirty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.119-123, March 07-12, 2000, Austin, Texas, United States
• 6: Jürgen Börstler , Olof Johansson, The students conference—a tool for the teaching of research, writing, and presentation skills, Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on the teaching of computing and the 3rd annual conference on Integrating technology into computer science education: Changing the delivery of computer science education, p.28-31, August 18-21, 1998, Dublin City Univ., Ireland
• 7: Henry A. Etlinger, A framework in which to teach (technical) communication to computer science majors, Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 03-05, 2006, Houston, Texas, USA
• 8: Cohen, P. A., J. A. Kulik, and C. L. C. Kulik. Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: a Meta-anaylsis of Findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, (1982), 237--248.
• 9: Falchikov, N., Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education, RoutledgeFalmer, London, 2001.
• 10: Sandra Y. Okita , Daniel L. Schwartz, When observation beats doing: learning by teaching, Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences, p.509-515, June 27-July 01, 2006, Bloomington, Indiana
• 11: Adrift, Adventure Development and Runner -- Interactive Fiction Toolkit, http://www.adrift.org.uk/

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education

General Terms:
Design, Experimentation, Human Factors, Performance

Keywords:
classroom management, communication skills, course pedagogy, curriculum issues