Publish and perish

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Publish and perish: why the current publication and review model is killing research and wasting your money

Full text

Html

Source

Ubiquity archive
Volume 2007 , Issue January () table of contents

Pages: 1 - 1

Year of Publication: 2007

Authors

Fabio Casati	University of Trento
Fausto Giunchiglia	University of Trento
Maurizio Marchese	University of Trento

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 7, Downloads (12 Months): 7, Citation Count: 2

Additional Information:

references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	10.1145/1226694.1226695

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	[Blog, 2005] Academia's Conflicted Reaction To Blogging. 2005 http://acrlblog.org/2005/11/28/academias-conflicted-reaction-to-blogging/
	2	Kent Beck, Extreme programming explained: embrace change, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1999
	3	[Chen, 2007] P. Chen, H. Xie, S. Maslov, and S. Redner. Finding scientific gems with Google. Journal of Informetrics, to appear (2007); (http://physics.bu.edu/~redner/pubs/ps/google.ps).
	4	Sergey Brin , Lawrence Page, The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, v.30 n.1-7, p.107-117, April 1, 1998
	5	[Ball, 2006] Philip Ball. Prestige is factored into journal ratings, Nature 439, 770-771 (2006).
	6	[Fisher, 1994] Martin Fisher, MD; Stanford B. Friedman, MD; Barbara Strauss. The Effects of Blinding on Acceptance of Research Papers by Peer Review. JAMA. 1994. http://www.ama-assn.org/public/peer/7_13_94/pv3058x.htm
	7	Samuel Madden , David DeWitt, Impact of double-blind reviewing on SIGMOD publication rates, ACM SIGMOD Record, v.35 n.2, p.29-32, June 2006 [doi>10.1145/1147376.1147381]
	8	Marko A. Rodriguez , Johan Bollen , Herbert Van De Sompel, The convergence of digital libraries and the peer-review process, Journal of Information Science, v.32 n.2, p.149-159, April 2006 [doi>10.1177/0165551506062327]
	9	[Rothwell, 2000] P. Rothwell and C. Martyn. Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience. Brain, Vol. 123, No. 9, 1964-1969, Sept. 2000 http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/123/9/1964
	10	Simone Santini, We Are Sorry to Inform You ..., Computer, v.38 n.12, p.128-127, December 2005 [doi>10.1109/MC.2005.423]
	11	[Tung, 2006] A. Tung. Impact of Double Blind Reviewing on SIGMOD Publication: A More Detail Analysis. 2006. http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~atung/

CITED BY 2

	Jeffrey C. Mogul , Tom Anderson, Before and after WOWCS: a literature survey, a list of papers we wish had been submitted, Proceedings of the conference on Organizing Workshops, Conferences, and Symposia for Computer Systems, p.1-11, April 15-15, 2008, San Francisco, California
	Jeffrey C. Mogul , Tom Anderson, Open issues in organizing computer systems conferences, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, v.38 n.3, July 2008