ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Which model of programming for LISP: sequential, functional or mixed?
Full text PdfPdf (911 KB)
Source ACM SIGPLAN Notices archive
Volume 26 ,  Issue 10  (October 1991) table of contents
Pages: 83 - 92  
Year of Publication: 1991
ISSN:0362-1340
Author
C. K. Yuen  DISCS, NUS, Kent Ridge, Singapore 0511
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 13,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/122616.122626
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This article reviews models of programming applicable to Lisp, and argues that both the sequential model and the functional model have developed in directions of excessive complexity. For future developments, a mixed model based on old-style Lisp, but augmented with new parallel constructs, can provide a simpler tool for handling practical programming tasks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
4
 
5
[5] C K Yuen and W F Wong, "BaLinda Lisp: a parallel list-processing language", Proc IEEE Conf on Tools for AI, Nov. 1990, pp. 618-624.
6
 
7
[7] P Wadler, "Efficient compilation of pattern matching", in S L Peyton Jones, The Implementation of Functional Programming Languages, Prentice-Hall, 1987, pp. 78-103.
8
 
9
[9] M D Feng, "Parallel Processing in BaLinda Lisp", Tech Rep No. TR41/90, DISCS, NUS, November 1990.