| Which model of programming for LISP: sequential, functional or mixed? |
| Full text |
Pdf
(911 KB)
|
| Source
|
ACM SIGPLAN Notices
archive
Volume 26 , Issue 10 (October 1991)
table of contents
Pages: 83 - 92
Year of Publication: 1991
ISSN:0362-1340
|
|
Author
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 13, Citation Count: 2
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
This article reviews models of programming applicable to Lisp, and argues that both the sequential model and the functional model have developed in directions of excessive complexity. For future developments, a mixed model based on old-style Lisp, but augmented with new parallel constructs, can provide a simpler tool for handling practical programming tasks.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
[5] C K Yuen and W F Wong, "BaLinda Lisp: a parallel list-processing language", Proc IEEE Conf on Tools for AI, Nov. 1990, pp. 618-624.
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
[7] P Wadler, "Efficient compilation of pattern matching", in S L Peyton Jones, The Implementation of Functional Programming Languages, Prentice-Hall, 1987, pp. 78-103.
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
[9] M D Feng, "Parallel Processing in BaLinda Lisp", Tech Rep No. TR41/90, DISCS, NUS, November 1990.
|
|