ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The agent network architecture (ANA)
Full text PdfPdf (634 KB)
Source ACM SIGART Bulletin archive
Volume 2 ,  Issue 4  (August 1991) table of contents
Pages: 115 - 120  
Year of Publication: 1991
ISSN:0163-5719
Author
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 70,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/122344.122367
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The goal of my work is to develop and implement an architecture for an autonomous agent, which I refer to as "ANA". An ANA agent consists of a distributed set of "competence modules". Competence modules are linked in a network. A spreading activation process operates on the network to decide what the "relevance" or relative strength of a competence module is in the current context. This process implements a competition among modules for activation energy. The higher the activation energy level of a module, the more likely it is that this module determines what the autonomous agent does or communicates to believe. Learning is a central, completely integrated feature of the architecture. The competence module network is continuously being developed and changed on the basis of experience: links are added and deleted depending on real world observations and new "macro modules" are created whenever a goal is achieved. This paper presents an overview of the architecture. It describes the functionalities that have been implemented, the results that have been obtained with robotic and simulated ANA agents, and finally it discusses (current) limitations and future work.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Agre, P. & Chapman, D. Pengi: An Implementation of a Theory of Activity, Proceedings of AAAI-87, Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, California, 1987.
 
2
Brooks, R. A Robust Layered Control System for a Mobile Robot. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation. Volume RA-2, Number 1, 1986.
 
3
 
4
Maes, P. The Dynamics of Action Selection. Proceedings of the IJCAI-89 conference, Detroit, 1989.
 
5
Maes, P. How To Do the Right Thing. Connection Science Journal. 1(3). 1989b.
 
6
Maes, P. and Brooks, R.A. Learning to Coordinate Behaviors. Proceedings of AAAI-90, 1990.
 
7
Maes, P. Situated Agents can Have Goals. In: Designing Autonomous Agents: Theory and Practice from Biology to Engineering and Back. P. Maes (editor). Special Issue of the Journal Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 6(1&2). Also MIT-Bradford Press book, 1991.
 
8
 
9
Maes, P. Adaptive Action Selection. Submitted to the Cognitive Science Conference 1991, 1991c.
 
10
Maes, P. How to Learn to Do the Right Thing Submitted to the European ALIFE Conference 1991, 1991d.
 
11

CITED BY  8