ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
VLSI implementation of an energy-aware wake-up detector for an acoustic surveillance sensor network
Full text PdfPdf (1.39 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) archive
Volume 2 ,  Issue 4  (November 2006) table of contents
Pages: 594 - 611  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:1550-4859
Authors
David H. Goldberg  Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Andreas G. Andreou  Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Pedro Julián  Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, CP, Argentina
Philippe O. Pouliquen  Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Laurence Riddle  Signal Systems Corporation, Severna Park, MD
Rich Rosasco  Signal Systems Corporation, Severna Park, MD
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 87,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1218556.1218562
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present a low-power VLSI wake-up detector for a sensor network that uses acoustic signals to localize ground-based vehicles. The detection criterion is the degree of low-frequency periodicity in the acoustic signal, and the periodicity is computed from the “bumpiness” of the autocorrelation of a one-bit version of the signal. We then describe a CMOS ASIC that implements the periodicity estimation algorithm. The ASIC is fully functional and its core consumes 835 nanowatts. It was integrated into an acoustic enclosure and deployed in field tests with synthesized sounds and ground-based vehicles.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Abdalla, H. and Horiuchi, T. K. 2005. An analog VLSI low-power envelope periodicity detector. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 52, 9 (Sept.), 1709--1720.
 
2
 
3
 
4
Cauwenberghs, G., Andreou, A., West, J., Stanacevic, M., Celik, A., Julián, P., Teixeira, T., Deiehl, C., and Riddle, L. 2005. A miniature low-power intelligent sensor node for persistent acoustic surveillance. In Unattended Ground Sensor Technologies and Applications VII, E. M. Carapezza, Ed. Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 5796. SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 294--305.
 
5
Ding, J., Cheung, S.-Y., Tan, C.-W., and Varaiya, P. 2004. Signal processing of sensor node data for vehicle detection. In Proceedings of the 7th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE, 70--75.
 
6
Friedman, D. H. 1977. Pseudo-maximum-likelihood speech pitch extraction. IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech, Sig. Proc. ASSP-25, 3 (June), 213--221.
 
7
8
 
9
Hui, J., Ren, Z., and Krogh, B. H. 2003. Sentry-based power management in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of Information Processing in Sensor Networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2634. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany 458--472.
 
10
 
11
Klapuri, A. 2000. Qualitative and quantitative aspects in the design of periodicity estimation algorithms. In Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference (EURASIP), Tampere, Finland.
 
12
Li, D., Wong, K. D., Hu, Y. H., and Sayeed, A. M. 2002. Detection, classification, and tracking of targets. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 19, 2 (Mar.), 17--29.
 
13
Morgan, S. and Raspet, R. 1992. Investigation of the mechanisms of low-frequency wind noise generation outdoors. J. Acous. Society Amer. 92, 2, 1180--1183.
 
14
Munich, M. E. 2004. Bayesian subspace methods for acoustic signature recognition of vehicles. In Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference (EURASIP) Vienna, Austria.
 
15
Noll, A. M. 1969. Pitch determination of human speech by the harmonic product spectrum, the harmonic sum spectrum, and a maximum likelihood estimate. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Computer Processing in Communications, Vol. 19. J. Fox, Ed. Wiley-Interscience, Chichester, Sussex, UK, 779--797.
 
16
Rabiner, L. 1977. On the use of autocorrelation analysis for pitch detection. IEEE Trans. Acoustics Speech, Sig. Proc.-25, 1 (Jan.), 24--33.
 
17
Rabiner, L. R., Cheng, M. J., Rosenberg, A. E., and McGonegal, C. A. 1976. A comparative performance study of several pitch detection algorithms. IEEE Trans. Acoustics Speech, Sig. Proc. 24, 5 (Oct.), 399--418.
 
18
Stanaćević, M. and Cauwenberghs, G. 2005. Micropower gradient flow acoustic localizer. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 52, 10 (Oct.), 2148--2157.
 
19
Van Trees, H. L. 2001. Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory: Part I. Detection, Estimation, and Linear Modulation Theory. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY.
 
20
Van Vleck, J. H. and Middleton, D. 1966. The spectrum of clipped noise. Proceedings of the IEEE 54, 1 (Jan.), 2--19.
 
21
Weinreb, S. 1963. A digital spectral analysis technique and its application to radio astronomy. Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
 
22
Wise, J. D., Caprio, J. R., and Parks, T. W. 1976. Maximum likelihood pitch estimation. IEEE Trans. Acoustics Speech, Sig. Proc. 24, 5 (Oct.), 418--423.

Collaborative Colleagues:
David H. Goldberg: colleagues
Andreas G. Andreou: colleagues
Pedro Julián: colleagues
Philippe O. Pouliquen: colleagues
Laurence Riddle: colleagues
Rich Rosasco: colleagues