ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Segmenting object space by geometric reference structures
Full text PdfPdf (224 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) archive
Volume 2 ,  Issue 4  (November 2006) table of contents
Pages: 455 - 465  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:1550-4859
Authors
Pankaj K. Agarwal  Duke University, Durham, NC
David Brady  Duke University, Durham, NC
Jiří Matoušek  Charles University
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 47,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1218556.1218557
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A model for segmentation of an object space by an array of binary, radiation-field sensors and geometric reference structures is described. Given a family of binary, radiation-field sensors and a geometric reference structure, we refer to the set of sensor states induced by a source at point p as the signature of p. We study the segmentation of an object space into signature cells and prove near optimal bounds on the number of distinct signatures induced by a point source, as a function of sensor and reference structure complexity. We also show that almost any family of signatures can be implemented under this model.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Agarwal, P. K., Alon, N., Aronov, B., and Suri, S. 1994. Can visibility graphs be represented compactly? Discrete Comput. Geom. 12, 347--365.
 
2
Agarwal, P. K. and Sharir, M. 2000. Arrangements and their applications. In Handbook of Computational Geometry, J.-R. Sack and J. Urrutia, Eds. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 49--119.
 
3
Alon, N. and Spencer, J. 1992. The Probabilistic Method. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
 
4
Brady, D. J., Pitsianis, N. P., and Sun, X. 2004. Reference structure tomography. J. Optic. Soc. Amer. 21, 7, 1140--1147.
 
5
 
6
Fenimore, E. E. 1978. Coded aperture imaging---predicted performance of uniformly redundant arrays. Applied Optics 17, 22, 3562--3570.
7
 
8
Gopinathan, U., Brady, D. J., and Pitsianis, N. P. 2003. Coded apertures for efficient pyroelectric motion tracking. Optics Express 11, 18, 2142--2152.
 
9
Gottesman, S. R. and Fenimore, E. E. 1989. New family of binary arrays for coded aperture imaging. Applied Optics 28, 20, 4344--4352.
10
 
11
Henderson, T. C., Grant, E., Luthy, K., Mattos, L., and Craver, M. 2005. Precision localization in Monte Carlo sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computer Applications Industry and Engineering. 26--31.
 
12
Mait, J. N., Athale, R., and van der Gracht, J. 2003. Evolutionary paths in imaging and recent trends. Optics Express 11, 18, 2093--2101.
 
13
 
14
Potuluri, P., Xu, M. B., and Brady, D. J. 2003. Imaging with random 3D reference structures. Optics Express 11, 18, 2134--2141.
 
15
16
 
17
Urrutia, J. 2000. Art gallery and illumination problems. In Handbook of Computational Geometry, J.-R. Sack and J. Urrutia, Eds. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 973--1027.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Pankaj K. Agarwal: colleagues
David Brady: colleagues
Jiří Matoušek: colleagues