ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Understanding accident and emergency department performance using simulation
Full text PdfPdf (228 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 38th conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Monterey, California
SESSION: Health care: emergency department operations table of contents
Pages: 446 - 452  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-4244-0501-7
Authors
Murat M. Gunal  Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
Michael Pidd  Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
Sponsors
IEICE ESS : Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, Engineering Sciences Society
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
ASA : American Statistical Association
IEEE-CS\DATC : The IEEE Computer Society
INFORMS-CS : Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences-College on Simulation
NIST : National Institute of Standards and Technology
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
(SCS) : The Society for Modeling and Simulation International
Publisher
Winter Simulation Conference 
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 70,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

As part of a larger project examining the effect of performance targets on UK hospitals, we present a simulation of an Accident and Emergency (A&E) Department. Performance targets are an important part of the National Health Service (NHS) performance assessment regime in the UK. Pressures on A&Es force the medical staff to take actions meeting these targets with limited resources. We used simulation modelling to help understand the factors affecting this performance. We utilized real data from patient admission system of an A&E and presented some data analysis. Our particular focuses are the multitasking behaviour and experience level of medical staff, both of which affect A&E performance. This performance affects, in turn, the overall performance of the hospital of which it is part.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bevan R. G. and Hood C. (2006) Have targets improved performance in the English NHS? BMJ. 2006 February 18; 332(7538): 419--422.
 
2
Carter M. (2002) Diagnosis: Mismanagement of Resources. OR/MS Today. April 2002, 29/2.
 
3
Chisholm C. D., E. K. Collison, D. R. Nelson, W. H. Cordell (2000) Emergency Department Workplace Interruptions: Are Emergency Physicians "Interrupt-driven" and "Multitasking"? Academic Emergency Medicine, November 2000, Volume 7, Number 11, 1239--1243.
 
4
Department of Health (1997) Patient's Charter developing a new charter and changes to the immediate assessment in A&E standard, www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/01/14/32/04011432.pdf {accessed 1 March 2006}.
 
5
Department of Health. (2003) Clinical exceptions to the 4 hour emergency care target. www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/07/95/56/04079556.pdf {accessed 1 April 2005}.
 
6
 
7
Gibson M., K. N. Jenkings, R. Wilson, I. Purves (2005) Multi-tasking in practice: Coordinated activities in the computer supported doctor-patient consultation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74, 425--436.
 
8
Lewis P. A. W. and Shedler G. S. (1979) Simulation of nonhomogeneous Poisson process by thinning. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 26, 403--13.
 
9
Locker T. E. and S. M. Mason (2005) Analysis of the distribution of time that patients spend in emergency departments, British Medical Journal 330 (2005) 1188--1189
 
10
11

Collaborative Colleagues:
Murat M. Gunal: colleagues
Michael Pidd: colleagues