ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
User technology—from pointing to pondering
Full text PdfPdf (1.43 MB)
Source History of Personal Workstations archive
Proceedings of the ACM Conference on The history of personal workstations table of contents
Palo Alto, California, United States
Pages: 183 - 198  
Year of Publication: 1986
ISBN:0-89791-176-8
Authors
Stuart Card  Xerox Palo Alto Research Center
Thomas Moran  Xerox Palo Alto Research Center
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 166,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/12178.12189
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

From its beginning, the technology of personal workstations has been driven by visions of a future in which people would work in intimate partnership with computer systems on significant intellectual tasks. These visions have been expressed in various forms: Memex (Bush, 1945), Man-Machine Symbiosis (Licklider, 1960), NLS (Engelbart, 1963), Dynabook (Kay, 1977), and others.The tight coupling between human and computer required by these visions necessitated advances in the ways humans and computers interact. These advances have slowly begun to accumulate into what might be called a user technology. This user technology includes hardware and software techniques for building effective user interfaces: bitmapped displays, menus, pointing devices, “modeless” command languages, animation, and interface metaphors. But it must include a technical understanding of the user himself and of the nature of human-computer interaction. This latter part, the scientific base of user technology, is necessary in order to understand why interaction techniques are (or are not) successful, to help us invent new techniques, and to pave the way for machines that aid humans in performing significant intellectual tasks. In this paper, we trace some of the history of our understanding of users and their interaction with workstation—the personal part of personal workstations. In keeping with the spirit of other papers at this conference, we have centered this review around our own experiences, perspectives, and work and have not attempted a complete history of the field. In concentrating on our own work, we do not wish to mimimize the importance of others' work; we simply want to tell our own story. Our focus is on what we have learned about users in our years of studying them and how we see our findings relating to the original visions of the personal workstation.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Anderson, 3. R. (1981). Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
 
2
 
3
Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly, August.
 
4
Card, S. K. (1978). Studies in the psychology of computer text editing systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie-Mellon University, Department of Psychology.
 
5
Card, S. K., English, W. K., & Burr, B. J. (1978). Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 21, 601-613.
 
6
Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1976). The manuscript editing task: A routine cognitive skill (Technical Report SSL-76-8). Palo Alto, CA: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center.
 
7
Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1980a). Computer text-editing: an information-processing analysis of a routine cognitive skill. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 32-74.
8
 
9
 
10
Card, S. K., Pavel, M., & Farrell, J. E.. (1984). Window-based computer dialogues. Proceedings of IFIPInteract '84, 355-359. London: IFIP.
 
11
Engelbart, D. (1963). A conceptual framework for the augmentation of man's intellect. In P. W. Howerton and D. C. Weeks (Eds.), Vistas in hoCormation Handling, Vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: Spartan Books.
 
12
English, W. K., Engelbart, D. C., & Berman, M. A. (1967). Display-selection techniques for text manipulation. 1EEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-8, 5-15.
 
13
Halasz, F. G. (1984). Mental models and problem solving in using a calculator. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
14
 
15
Irby, C., Bergsteinsson, L., Moran, T. P., Newman, W., & Tesler, L. (1977). A methodology for user interface design. Palo Alto, CA: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center.
 
16
Kay, A. (1977). Microelectronics and the personal computer. Scientific American, September, 230-244.
 
17
Licklider, J. C. R. (1960). Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-I (March), 4-11.
 
18
Moran, T. P. (1978). Introduction to the Command Language Grammar (Technical Report SSL-78-3). Palo Alto, CA: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center.
 
19
Moran, T. P. (1981). The command language grammar: A representation for the user interface of interactive computer systems. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 15, 3-50.
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
Payne, S. J. (1984). Task-action grammars. Proceedings of Interact "84: First IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, London. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
 
24
Young, R. M. (1981). The machine inside the machine: users' models of pocket calculators. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 15, 51-86.
 
25
Young, R. M. (1983). Surrogates and mappings: two kinds of conceptual models for interactive devices. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Stuart Card: colleagues
Thomas Moran: colleagues