ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Making routing robust to changing traffic demands: algorithms and evaluation
Full text PdfPdf (973 KB)
Source IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON) archive
Volume 14 ,  Issue 6  (December 2006) table of contents
Pages: 1193 - 1206  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:1063-6692
Authors
David Applegate  AT&T Labs-Research, Florham Park, NJ
Edith Cohen  AT&T Labs-Research, Florham Park, NJ
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 91,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1109/TNET.2006.886296

ABSTRACT

Intra-domain traffic engineering can significantly enhance the performance of large IP backbone networks. Two important components of traffic engineering are understanding the traffic demands and configuring the routing protocols. These two components are inter-linked, as it is widely believed that an accurate view of traffic is important for optimizing the configuration of routing protocols, and through that, the utilization of the network.This basic premise, however, seems never to have been quantified. How important is accurate knowledge of traffic demands for obtaining good utilization of the network? Since traffic demand values are dynamic and illusive, is it possible to obtain a routing that is "robust" to variations in demands?We develop novel algorithms for constructing optimal robust routings and for evaluating the performance of any given routing on loosely constrained rich sets of traffic demands. Armed with these algorithms we explore these questions on a diverse collection of ISP networks. We arrive at a surprising conclusion: it is possible to obtain a robust routing that guarantees a nearly optimal utilization with a fairly limited knowledge of the applicable traffic demands.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
 
4
5
 
6
[6] S. Bhattacharya, C. Diot, J. Jetcheva, and N. Taft, "Geographical and temporal characteristics of inter-POP flows: view from a single POP," Eur. Trans. Telecommun., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 5-22, Feb. 2002.
 
7
[7] J. Cao, D. Davis, S. V. Wiel, and B. Yu, "Time-varying network tomography: router link data," J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., vol. 95, pp. 1063-1075, 2000.
 
8
[8] Configuring OSPF Cisco, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.cisco. com/uni-verc/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios113ed/113ed_cr/np1_c/ 1cospf.htm
 
9
[9] CPLEX Large-Scale Mathematical Programming Software 2003 [On-line]. Available: http://www.cplex.com
 
10
 
11
 
12
[12] B. Fortz and M. Thorup, "Internet traffic engineering by optimizing OSPF weights," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2000, pp. 519-528.
 
13
[13] B. Fortz and M. Thorup, "Optimizing OSPF/IS-IS weights in a changing world," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 756-767, May 2002.
 
14
[14] B. Grötschel, L. Lovasz, and A. Schrijver, Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988.
 
15
16
17
 
18
[18] D. Mitra and K. G. Ramakrishna, "A case study of multiservice, multipriority traffic engineering design for data networks," in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM, 1999, pp. 1077-1083.
 
19
 
20
21
22
 
23
[23] Internet Traffic Engineering Working Group, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/OLD/tewg-charter.html.


Collaborative Colleagues:
David Applegate: colleagues
Edith Cohen: colleagues