ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters
Full text PdfPdf (847 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD) archive
Volume 1 ,  Issue 1  (March 2007) table of contents
Article No. 2  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:1556-4681
Authors
Jure Leskovec  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Jon Kleinberg  Cornell University
Christos Faloutsos  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 43,   Downloads (12 Months): 424,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1217299.1217301
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

How do real graphs evolve over time? What are normal growth patterns in social, technological, and information networks? Many studies have discovered patterns in static graphs, identifying properties in a single snapshot of a large network or in a very small number of snapshots; these include heavy tails for in- and out-degree distributions, communities, small-world phenomena, and others. However, given the lack of information about network evolution over long periods, it has been hard to convert these findings into statements about trends over time.

Here we study a wide range of real graphs, and we observe some surprising phenomena. First, most of these graphs densify over time with the number of edges growing superlinearly in the number of nodes. Second, the average distance between nodes often shrinks over time in contrast to the conventional wisdom that such distance parameters should increase slowly as a function of the number of nodes (like O(log n) or O(log(log n)).

Existing graph generation models do not exhibit these types of behavior even at a qualitative level. We provide a new graph generator, based on a forest fire spreading process that has a simple, intuitive justification, requires very few parameters (like the flammability of nodes), and produces graphs exhibiting the full range of properties observed both in prior work and in the present study.

We also notice that the forest fire model exhibits a sharp transition between sparse graphs and graphs that are densifying. Graphs with decreasing distance between the nodes are generated around this transition point.

Last, we analyze the connection between the temporal evolution of the degree distribution and densification of a graph. We find that the two are fundamentally related. We also observe that real networks exhibit this type of relation between densification and the degree distribution.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Abello, J. 2004. Hierarchical graph maps. Comput. Graph. 28, 3, 345--359.
 
2
 
3
 
4
Adamic, L. A. 2000. Zipf, power-law, pareto---a ranking tutorial. http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/idl/papers/ranking.
 
5
Albert, R. and Barabasi, A.-L. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science. 509--512.
 
6
Albert, R., Jeong, H., and Barabasi, A.-L. 1999. Diameter of the World-Wide Web. Nature 401, 130--131.
 
7
Alderson, D., Doyle, J. C., Li, L., and Willinger, W. 2005. Towards a theory of scale-free graphs: Definition, properties, and implications. Internet Math. 2, 4.
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
12
 
13
Chakrabarti, D., Zhan, Y., and Faloutsos, C. 2004. R-mat: A recursive model for graph mining. In Proceedings of the SIAM Conference on Data Mining (SDM).
 
14
Chung, F. and Lu, L. 2002. The average distances in random graphs with given expected degrees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99, 25, 15879--15882.
 
15
 
16
Dorogovtsev, S. and Mendes, J. 2001a. Effect of the accelerated growth of communications networks on their structure. Phys. Rev. E 63, 025101.
 
17
Dorogovtsev, S. and Mendes, J. 2001b. Language as an evolving word web. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268, 2603.
 
18
Dorogovtsev, S. and Mendes, J. 2002. Accelerated growth of networks. In Handbook of Graphs and Networks: From the Genome to the Internet, S. Bornholdt and H.G. Schuster. Eds. Wiley-VCH, Berlin, Germany.
 
19
20
21
 
22
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., and Trajtenberg, M. 2001. The nber patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Papers 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. (Oct.)
 
23
Huberman, B. A. and Adamic, L. A. 1999. Growth dynamics of the world-wide web. Nature 399, 131.
 
24
Katz, J. S. 1999. The self-similar science system. Resear. Policy 28, 501--517.
 
25
Katz, J. S. 2005. Scale independent bibliometric indicators. Measure.: Interdisciplin. Resea. Perspect. 3, 24--28.
 
26
Kleinberg, J. M. 2002. Small-world phenomena and the dynamics of information. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14.
 
27
Kleinberg, J. M., Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., and Tomkins, A. 1999. The Web as a graph: Measurements, models, and methods. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Combinatorics and Computing. 1--17.
 
28
Kossinets, G. and Watts, D. J. 2006. Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science 311, 88--90.
 
29
Krapivsky, P. L. and Redner, S. 2001. Organization of growing random networks. Phys. Rev. E 63, 066123.
 
30
Krapivsky, P. L. and Redner, S. 2005. Network growth by copying. Phys. Rev. E 71, 036118.
 
31
 
32
33
 
34
Leskovec, J., Chakrabarti, D., Kleinberg, J. M., and Faloutsos, C. 2005. Realistic, mathematically tractable graph generation and evolution, using kronecker multiplication. In Proceedings of the European International Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (PKDD'05). 133--145.
35
36
 
37
Menczer, F. 2002. Growing and navigating the small world web by local content. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99, 22, 14014--14019.
 
38
Milgram, S. 1967. The small-world problem. Psycholo. Today 2, 60--67.
 
39
Mitzenmacher, M. 2004. A brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions. Internet Math. 1, 2, 226--251.
 
40
Newman, M. E. J. 2003. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 45, 167--256.
 
41
Newman, M. E. J. 2005. Power laws, pareto distributions and zipf's law. Contemp. Phys. 46, 323--351.
42
 
43
Oregon. 1997. University of Oregon route views project. online data and reports. http://www.routeviews.org.
44
 
45
Redner, S. 2004. Citation statistics from more than a century of physical review. Tech. rep. physics/0407137, arXiv.
 
46
Schroeder, M. 1991. Fractals, Chaos, Power Laws: Minutes from an Infinite Paradise. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY.
 
47
Tauro, S. L., Palmer, C., Siganos, G., and Faloutsos, M. 2001. A simple conceptual model for the internet topology. In Global Internet. San Antonio, TX.
 
48
Vazquez, A. 2001. Disordered networks generated by recursive searches. Europhy. Lett. 54, 4, 430--435.
 
49
Vazquez, A. 2003. Growing networks with local rules: Preferential attachment, clustering hierarchy and degree correlations. Physical Review E 67, 056104.
 
50
Watts, D. J., Dodds, P. S., and Newman, M. E. J. 1998. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393, 440--442.
 
51
Watts, D. J., Dodds, P. S., and Newman, M. E. J. 2002. Identity and search in social networks. Science 296, 1302--1305.

CITED BY  10

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jure Leskovec: colleagues
Jon Kleinberg: colleagues
Christos Faloutsos: colleagues