The monitorability of service-level agreements for application-service provision

ABSTRACT

Service-Level Agreements (SLAs) mitigate the risks of a service-provision scenario by associating financial penalties with aberrant service behaviour. SLAs are useless if their provisions can be unilaterally ignored by a party without incurring any liability. To avoid this, it is necessary to ensure that each party's conformance to its obligations can be monitored by the other parties. We introduce a technique for analysing systems of SLAs to determine the degree of monitorability possible. We apply this technique to identify the most monitorable system of SLAs including timeliness constraints for a three-role Application-Service Provision (ASP) scenario. The system contains SLAs that are at best mutually monitorable, implying the requirement for reconciliation of monitoring data between the parties, and hence the need to constrain the parties to report honestly while accommodating unavoidable measurement error. We describe the design of a fair constraint on the precision and accuracy of reported measurements, and its approximate monitorability using a statistical hypothesis test.

REFERENCES

• 1: Implementation of tools for monitorability analysis, 2006. http://uclslang.sourceforge.net/monitorability.html.
• 2: The SLAng language and tools, 2006. http://uclslang.sourceforge.net/.
• 3: C. Bettini , S. Jajodia , X. Wang , D. Wijesekera, Obligation Monitoring in Policy Management, Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (POLICY'02), p.2, June 05-07, 2002
• 4: J. G. Cederquist , R. Corin , M. A. C. Dekker , S. Etalle , J. I. den Hartog, An Audit Logic for Accountability, Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (POLICY'05), p.34-43, June 06-08, 2005 [doi>10.1109/POLICY.2005.5]
• 5: Nicodemos Damianou , Naranker Dulay , Emil Lupu , Morris Sloman, The Ponder Policy Specification Language, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, p.18-38, January 29-31, 2001
• 6: Global Grid Forum. Web Services Agreement Specification (WS-Agreement) Version 2005/09.
• 7: International Business Machines (IBM), Inc. Web Service Level Agreement (WSLA) Language Specification, January 2003.
• 8: R. Jain. The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1991.
• 9: Leslie Lamport, Time, clocks, and the ordering of events in a distributed system, Communications of the ACM, v.21 n.7, p.558-565, July 1978 [doi>10.1145/359545.359563]
• 10: James Skene , D. Davide Lamanna , Wolfgang Emmerich, Precise Service Level Agreements, Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, p.179-188, May 23-28, 2004
• 11: James Skene , Wolfgang Emmerich, Specifications, not meta-models, Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Global integrated model management, May 22-22, 2006, Shanghai, China [doi>10.1145/1138304.1138315]
• 12: M. Sloman. Policy driven management for distributed systems. In Journal of Network and Systems Management, volume 2. Plenum Press, 1994.
• 13: Vladimir Tosic , Bernard Pagurek, Service offerings for xml web services and their management applications, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ont., Canada, 2004
• 14: Wikipedia. Chebychev's Inequality, 2006. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chebyshev%27s_inequality.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.2 COMPUTER-COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
      C.2.4 Distributed Systems

General Terms:
Management, Measurement, Performance, Theory

Keywords:
ASP, SLA