ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Performance of ad hoc networks with two-hop relay routing and limited packet lifetime
Full text PdfPdf (241 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 180 archive
Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Performance evaluation methodolgies and tools table of contents
Pisa, Italy
SESSION: Routing and spreading table of contents
Article No. 49  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-504-5
Authors
Ahmad Al Hanbali  INRIA, Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Philippe Nain  INRIA, Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Eitan Altman  INRIA, Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 44,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1190095.1190158
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Considered is a mobile ad hoc network consisting of three types of nodes (source, destination and relay nodes) and using the two-hop relay routing protocol. Packets at relay nodes are assumed to have a limited lifetime in the network. All nodes are moving inside a bounded region according to some random mobility model. Both closed-form expressions, and asymptotic results when the number of nodes is large, are provided for the packet delivery delay and the energy needed to transmit a packet from the source to its destination. We also introduce and evaluate a variant of the two-hop relay protocol that limits the number of generated copies in the network. Our model is validated through simulations for two mobility models (random waypoint and random direction mobility models), numerical results for the two-hop relay protocols are reported, and the performance of the two-hop routing and of the epidemic routing protocols are compared.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Delay tolerant research group. Web site: http://www.dtnrg.org.
 
2
D. Anick, D. Mitra, and M. M. Sondhi. Stochastic theory of a data-handling system with multiple sources. Bell System Technical Journal, 61(8):1871--1896, Oct. 1982.
3
 
4
J.-Y. L. Boudec and M. Vojnovic. Perfect simulation and stationarity of a class of mobility models. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, Miami, FL, Apr. 2005.
5
 
6
A. E. Gamal, J. Mammen, B. Prabhakar, and D. Shah. Throughput-delay trade-off in wireless networks. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, Hong Kong, Apr. 2004.
 
7
C. Grinstead and J. Snell. Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society, 1997.
 
8
R. Groenevelt, P. Nain, and G. Koole. The message delay in mobile ad hoc networks. In Posters ACM SIGMETRICS 2005, Canada, 2005.
 
9
 
10
P. Gupta and P. R. Kumar. The capacity of wireless networks. ACM/IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 46(2), Mar. 2000.
 
11
A. A. Hanbali, P. Nain, and E. Altman. Performance evaluation of packet relaying in ad hoc network. Technical Report RR-5860, INRIA, Mar. 2006.
 
12
T. G. Kurtz. Solutions of ordinary differential equations as limits of pure jump markov processes. Applied Probility, 7:49--58, 1970.
 
13
B. L. P. Nain, D. Towsley and Z. Liu. Properties of random direction models. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, Miami, FL, Mar. 2005.
14
15
 
16
E. Zhang, G. Neglia, J. Kurose, and D. Towsley. Performance modeling of epidemic routing. In Proc. of Networking, pages 827--839, Coimbra, Portugal, May 2006.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Ahmad Al Hanbali: colleagues
Philippe Nain: colleagues
Eitan Altman: colleagues