ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Mobile data broadcasting over MBMS tradeoffs in forward error correction
Full text PdfPdf (450 KB)
Source Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia; Vol. 193 archive
Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Mobile and ubiquitous multimedia table of contents
Stanford, California
Article No. 10  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-607-6
Authors
Mike Luby  Digital Fountain, Inc., Fremont, California
Mark Watson  Digital Fountain, Inc., Fremont, California
Tiago Gasiba  Digital Fountain, Inc., Fremont, California
Thomas Stockhammer  Digital Fountain, Inc., Fremont, California
Sponsors
: MediaX-Stanford University
: Nokia
: Ricoh
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 110,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1186655.1186665
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) and Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB) have just recently specified the use Raptor codes in their mobile broadcast file delivery engine. Until today, investigations of the applicability of these codes to the mentioned systems have been carried out by assuming almost exclusively quite simple loss models such as statistically independent radio packet losses. Furthermore, the combination and tradeoffs between physical layer parameters such as transmit power or physical layer for-ward error correction code rates in system design has been completely ignored. In this work we investigate the end-to-end system performance by analyzing the trade-off between physical layer parameters and application layer code. In particular we are interested in determining the optimal system operating points for optimized broadcast file delivery. Parameters such as power allocation, mobility model, physical layer Turbo code rate, raptor code expansion ratio are investigated and a single performance criteria is defined, namely the required energy to deliver a file to at least some high percentage of users. It is shown that typically considered system configurations with high transmit power and low physical layer code rates - resulting in low radio block loss rates - are in general suboptimal for efficient delivery. A careful tradeoff the system parameters can reduce the required resources in the order of a magnitude.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
3GPP TR26.946 V0.0.5. 2005. MBMS User Service Guidelines. 3GPP, San Diego, CA, USA, May.
 
2
3GPP TS 23.246 V6.9.0. 2005. Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Multimedia Broadcast/Multicast Service; Architecture and functional description, December.
 
3
3GPP TS 25.212 V7.0.0. 2006. Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Multiplexing and channel coding (FDD), March.
 
4
3GPP TS 25.222 V7.0.0. 2006. Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Multiplexing and channel coding (TDD), March.
 
5
3GPP TS 25.346 V7.0.0. 2006. Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Introduction of the Multimedia Broad-cast Multicast Service (MBMS) in the Radio Access Network (RAN), March.
 
6
3GPP TS 25.993 V6.13.0. 2006. Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Typical examples of Radio Access Bearers (RABs) and Radio Bearers (RBs) supported by Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA), March.
 
7
3GPP TS 26.346 V6.1.0. 2005. Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Multimedia Broadcast/Multicast Service; Protocols and Codecs, June.
 
8
3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 R1--030984. 2003. Link Error Prediction for E-DCH. PSM SWG, Seoul, South Korea, Oct.
 
9
3GPP TSG-SA WG4 S4-AHP238. 2005. Specification Text for Systematic Raptor Forward Error Correction. PSM SWG, Sophia Antipolis, France, Apr.
 
10
3GPP TSG-SA WG4 S4-AHP252. 2005. FEC simulation parameters and assumptions for GERAN. Sophia Antipolis, France, Apr.
 
11
ETSI DVB TM-CBMS1167. 2005. IP Datacast over DVB-H: Content Delivery Protocols, Sept. Draft Technical Specification, http://www.dvb.org.
 
12
Gasiba, T., Stockhammer, T., and Xu, W. 2006. Reliable and Efficient Download Delivery with Raptor Codes. TC'06, Munich, Germany, July.
 
13
Luby, M., Watson, M., Gasiba, T., Stockhammer, T., and Xu, W. Raptor Codes for Reliable Download Delivery in Wireless Broadcast Systems. CCNC 2006, Las Vegas, NV, Jan. 2006.
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
Paila, T., Luby, M., Lehtonen, R., Roca, V., and Walsh, R. 2004. FLUTE - File Delivery over Unidirectional Transport. Tech. rep., IETF, RFC3926, Oct.
 
18
Shokrollahi, A. 2003. Raptor codes. Tech. Rep. DR2003-06-001, Digital Fountain, Jun.
 
19

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mike Luby: colleagues
Mark Watson: colleagues
Tiago Gasiba: colleagues
Thomas Stockhammer: colleagues