ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Vizability: a tool for usability engineering process improvement through the visualization of usability problem data
Full text PdfPdf (142 KB)
Source ACM Southeast Regional Conference archive
Proceedings of the 44th annual Southeast regional conference table of contents
Melbourne, Florida
SESSION: Agents, interactions and mobility III table of contents
Pages: 620 - 625  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-315-8
Authors
Pardha S. Pyla  Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA
Jonathan R. Howarth  Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA
Chris Catanzaro  Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA
Chris North  Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 46,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1185448.1185584
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present Vizability, a usability engineering tool that is motivated by the variability of analysis processes and facilitates the analysis of existing problem data with the goal of process improvement. Usability engineers spend considerable resources performing usability testing and analyzing the resulting data, but their work is often limited to a single development effort or a small set of similar efforts. To extend the analysis process to multiple diverse efforts, it is necessary to categorize and store data in a consistent manner and have techniques for discovering patterns in that data. Our tool is designed to work with problem data that has been organized according to a hierarchical framework of usability concepts, which ensures consistency through completeness and precision. In addition, our tool helps engineers discover weaknesses in their process through exploratory browsing of a visualization of the tree structure and visual filtering based on cost, importance, and keywords.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
Hartson, H. R., Shivakumar, P. and Pérez-Quiñones, M. A. Usability inspection of digital libraries: A case study. Journal of Digital Libraries Special Issue on Usability of Digital Libraries, 4, 2, 2004, 108--123.
 
6
Holm, R., Priglinger, M., Stauder, E., Volkert, J. and Wagner, R. Automatic data acquisition and visualization for usability evaluation of VR systems. Eurographics, 2002
7
 
8
 
9
Molich, R., Bevan, N., Curson, I., Butler, S., Kindlund, E., Miller, D. and Kirakowski, J. Comparative evaluation of usability tests. Usability Professionals Association 1998 Conference, 1998.
10
 
11
Norman, D. A. Cognitive engineering. In Norman, D. A. and Draper, S. W. eds. User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1986, 31--61.
 
12
Pyla, P. S., Pérez-Quiñones, M. A., Arthur, J. D. and Hartson, H. R. Towards a model-based framework for integrating usability and software engineering life cycles. Interact 2003 Workshop on "Closing the Gaps: Software Engineering and Human Computer Interaction", Université catholique de Louvain, Institut d' Administration et de Gestion (IAG) on behalf of the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP), 2004, 67--74.
 
13
Pyla, P. S., Pérez-Quiñones, M. A., Arthur, J. D. and Hartson, H. R. Ripple: An event driven design representation framework for integrating usability and software engineering life cycles. In Seffah, A., Gulliksen, J. and Desmarais, M. eds. Human-Centered Software Engineering: Integrating Usability in the Development Process, Kluwer HCI series, 2005.
14
 
15


Collaborative Colleagues:
Pardha S. Pyla: colleagues
Jonathan R. Howarth: colleagues
Chris Catanzaro: colleagues
Chris North: colleagues