ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Large dataset offers view of math and computer self-efficacy among computer science undergraduates
Full text PdfPdf (249 KB)
Source ACM Southeast Regional Conference archive
Proceedings of the 44th annual Southeast regional conference table of contents
Melbourne, Florida
SESSION: Computer education I table of contents
Pages: 158 - 163  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-315-8
Authors
Antonio M. Lopez, Jr.  Xavier University of Louisiana
Marguerite S. Giguette  Xavier University of Louisiana
Lisa J. Schulte  Xavier University of Louisiana
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 31,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1185448.1185484
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

First-year data from a large, nationwide, three-year longitudinal study of undergraduates in the computing disciplines have been obtained and are in the process of being analyzed. Participants were from both Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Predominantly White Institutions. This paper presents an initial analysis of just two of the twelve variables being investigated -- math self-efficacy and computer self-efficacy -- and focuses primarily on computer science undergraduates. Comparisons are made between the first-year computer science subjects and first-year subjects from non-computing disciplines who also participated in the survey in order to verify commonly held views about these two variables. Among the computer science subjects, the two variables are examined more closely with respect to gender, ethnicity, university type, and year in school.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Cassidy, S. and Eachus, P. Developing the Computer Self-efficacy (CSE) Scale: Investigating the relationships between CSE, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26, 2 (2002) 133--153.
 
3
 
4
Kranzler, J. and Pajares, F. An exploratory factor analysis of the Mathematics Self-Efficacy Scale Revised (MSES-R). Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 29, 4, (1997) 215--228
 
5
Lent, R., Brown, S., and Hackett, G. Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance {Monograph}. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, (1994) 79--122.
6
7
 
8
Margolis, J. and Fisher, A. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in computing. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.
 
9
Shackelford, R., Cross, J., Davis, G., Impagliazzo, J., Kamali, R., LeBlance, R., Lunt, B., McGettrick, A., Sloan, R., and Topi, H. Computing Curricula 2005: The Overview Report (DRAFT). Accessed May 10, 2005. Available at http://www.acm.org/education/Draft_5-23-051.pdf.
 
10
Torkzadeh, G. and Koufteros, X. Factor validity of a computer self-efficacy scale and the impact of computer training. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 3, (1994) 813--821
 
11
Vegso, J. Interest in CS as a major drops among incoming freshmen. Computing Research News, 17, 3 (2005). On the Internet at www.cra.org/CRN/articles/may05/vegso.html.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Antonio M. Lopez, Jr.: colleagues
Marguerite S. Giguette: colleagues
Lisa J. Schulte: colleagues