ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Student perspectives of ePortfolios in computing education
Full text PdfPdf (192 KB)
Source ACM Southeast Regional Conference archive
Proceedings of the 44th annual Southeast regional conference table of contents
Melbourne, Florida
SESSION: Computer education I table of contents
Pages: 152 - 157  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-315-8
Authors
Albert Dieter Ritzhaupt  University of South Florida, Tampa FL
Oma Singh  University of South Florida, Tampa FL
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 77,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1185448.1185483
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the preliminary findings of the Electronic Portfolio Student Perspective Instrument (EPSPI) developed to ascertain student attitudes and intended uses of ePortfolios integrated in computing education. A student-centered stakeholder interaction model is presented to discuss the benefits of ePortfolio integration. We identified four constructs related to ePortfolios from a student perspective: employment, visibility, assessment, and learning. The instrument development process is discussed and the preliminary results of 22 students in a computing science program. Reliability and descriptive statistical information is provided. The authors advocate the integration of ePortfolios in computing education.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Accreditation Board of Engineering Technology, Retrieved June 27, 2005 from: http://www.abet.org.
 
2
Acker, S. Technology-Enabled Teaching/eLearning Dialogue: Overcoming Obstacles to Authentic ePortfolio Assessment. Retrieved June 25, 2005, from Campus Technology Web-site: http://www.campus-technology.com/news_article.asp?id=10788&typeid=155.
 
3
Barrett, H. C. Technology-Supported Portfolio Assessment, The Computing Teacher, (March, 1994).
 
4
Barrett, H. C. Pedagogical issues in electronic portfolio implementation, Proceedings of the American Educational Research Association Conference, (Chicago, IL, April 22, 2002).
 
5
Barrett, H. C., Wilkerson, J. Conflicting Paradigms in Electronic Portfolio Approaches: Choosing an Electronic Portfolio Strategy that Matches your Conceptual Framework, 2004, Retrieved June 27, 2005 from: http://electronicportfolios.org/systems/paradigms.html.
 
6
ePortfolio Consortium. ePortfolio White Paper, Version 1, (Nov. 2003), Retrieved June 27, 2005 from: http://www.eportconsortium.org/Uploads/whitepaperV1_0. pdf.
 
7
Gibson, D., & Barrett, H. Directions in Electronic Portfolio Development, Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 2, 4, 2002, 556--573.
 
8
Jafari, A, The "Sticky" ePortfolio System: Tackling Challenges and Identifying Attributes. EDUCAUSE Review, 39, 4, 2004, 38--48.
 
9
Lorenzo, G., Ittelson, J. An Overview of E-Portfolios. The EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, (July 26). Retrieved November 15 2005 from: http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3001.pdf
 
10
Nunnaly, J, Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, NY, 1978.
 
11
Siemens, G., ePortfolios, eLearnSpace: Everything ELearning, 2004, Retrieved June 27, 2005 from: http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/eportfolios.htm.
 
12
Wheeler, B. C., (2003). EPortfolio Project, Open Source ePortfolio Release, Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, Version 2.0, Retrieved June 27, 2005 from: http://juicy.mellon.org/RIT/MellonOSProjects/%20ePortfolio/Portfolio_Proposal_Public.doc.
 
13
Love, D., McKean, G., Gathercoal, P., Portfolios to Webfolios and Beyond: Levels of Maturation, EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 27, 2, 2004, 24--37.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Albert Dieter Ritzhaupt: colleagues
Oma Singh: colleagues