ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
HELLAS: a specialized architecture for interactive deformable object modeling
Full text PdfPdf (261 KB)
Source ACM Southeast Regional Conference archive
Proceedings of the 44th annual Southeast regional conference table of contents
Melbourne, Florida
SESSION: Graphics and real-time systems table of contents
Pages: 56 - 61  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-315-8
Authors
Shrirang Yardi  Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
Benjamin Bishop  University of Scranton, Scranton, PA
Thomas Kelliher  Goucher College, Baltimore, MD
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 11,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1185448.1185462
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Applications involving interactive modeling of deformable objects require highly iterative, floating-point intensive numerical simulations. As the complexity of these models increases, the computational power required for their simulation quickly grows beyond the capabilities of current general purpose systems. In this paper, we present the design of a low--cost, high--performance, specialized architecture to accelerate these simulations. Our aim is to use such specialized hardware to allow complex interactive physical modeling even on consumer-grade PCs. In this paper, we present details of the target algorithms, the HELLAS architecture, simulation results and lessons learned from our implementation.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ageia Technologies Inc. http://www.ageia.com.
 
2
Ageia Technologies Inc. Physics, Gameplay and the Physics Processing Unit. http://www.ageia.com/products/physx.html, March 2005.
 
3
J. Armstrong, B. Vick, and E. Scott. Platform based physical response modeling. In Proc. High Performance Computing Symposium, April 2004.
 
4
F. S. Azar, D. N. Metaxas, and M. D. Schnall. Methods for modeling and predicting mechanical deformations of the breast under external perturbations. Med Image Anal., 6(1):1--27, March 2002.
5
6
7
 
8
Game Developer's Conference - Keynotes. http://www.gdconf.com/conference/keynotes.htm, 2005.
 
9
G. Govindu, L. Zhuo, S. Choi, and V. Prasanna. Analysis of high-performance floating-point arithmetic on fpgas. In Reconfigurable Architectures Workshop, IPDPS, April 2004.
 
10
 
11
Mosis Integrated Circuit Fabrication Service. http://www.mosis.org.
 
12
Semiconductor, Industry, and Association. International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors. http://public.itrs.net, December 2002.
 
13
J. ShewChuk. An Introduction to the Conjugate Gradient Method Wihout the Agonizing Pain. http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/jrs/jrspapers.html, August 1994.
 
14
A. Witkin and D. Baraff. Physically based modeling: Principles and practice. In Lecture Notes, ACM SIGGRAPH, 1997.
 
15
 
16
S. Yardi, B. Bishop, and T. Kelliher. An analysis of interactive deformable solid object modeling. In International Conference on Modeling. Simulation and Visualization Methods, pages 95--99, Las Vegas, NV, June 2003.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Shrirang Yardi: colleagues
Benjamin Bishop: colleagues
Thomas Kelliher: colleagues