ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Applying constructivist principles to reinvigorate faculty training
Full text PdfPdf (182 KB)
Source User Services Conference archive
Proceedings of the 34th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services table of contents
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Pages: 157 - 160  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-438-3
Authors
Paul Hyde  University of Delaware, Newark, DE
Suzanne Nanis  University of Delaware, Newark, DE
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGUCCS: ACM Special Interest Group on University and College Computing Services
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 23,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1181216.1181252
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Traditionally, faculty training programs have used Information Technology (IT) instructor-led sessions to impart technology skills through pre-scripted exercises. The selection of topics is typically made by IT staff based on available technologies with which they are familiar. While faculty may find these learning experiences initially satisfactory, they are often challenged to make the personal connection to their specific teaching needs.The University of Delaware has reinvigorated its summer faculty institute program by applying constructivist learning principles. The process begins with a competitive application for participation in which a faculty member identifies learning goals for their students and technical skills that the applicant would like to master along with their current skills and barriers to progress. Upon acceptance, faculty learning styles are profiled. The preliminary information is used to establish objectives, identify session topics, and assign staff roles to meet individual needs drawing from a palette of varied learning situations.The participants are provided a laptop-based technology bundle to accomplish their goals. Faculty members are introduced to successful technology applications by their experienced colleagues. Participants work on a project of their choosing throughout the skill-based sessions. Faculty members have the opportunity to form a cohort for continued learning and support after the institute ends.This paper will detail the conceptual framework of the faculty institute and will describe specific tools including: participant applications, daily surveys, and companion course materials. The authors will share the strategies and challenges of applying constructivist principles to a faculty training program.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bruner, J., The Culture of Education. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1997.
 
2
Edwards, D. and Mercer, N., Common Knowledge: The Development of Understanding in the Classroom. London: Methuen, 1987.
 
3
Freire, P. Pedagogy of Freedom. Oxford, England: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers, 1998.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Paul Hyde: colleagues
Suzanne Nanis: colleagues