|
ABSTRACT
Information display systems have become increasingly complex and more difficult for human cognition to process effectively. Based upon Wicken's Multiple Resource Theory (MRT), information delivered using multiple modalities (i.e., visual and tactile) could be more effective than communicating the same information through a single modality. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare user effectiveness when using visual-tactile task feedback (a multimodality) to using only visual task feedback (a single modality). Results indicate that using visual-tactile feedback enhances task effectiveness more so than visual feedback (g = .38). When assessing different criteria, visual-tactile feedback is particularly effective at reducing reaction time (g = .631) and increasing performance (g = .618). Follow up moderator analyses indicate that visual-tactile feedback is more effective when workload is high (g = .844) and multiple tasks are being performed (g = .767). Implications of results are discussed in the paper.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Wickens, C., (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 2, 159--177.
|
| |
2
|
Chiasson, J., McGrath, B., & Rupert, A. (2002). Enhanced situation awareness in sea, air, and land environment. In Proceedings of NATO RTO Human Factors & Medicine Panel Symposium on "Spatial disorientation in military vehicles: Causes, consequences and cures," La Coruñña, Spain, No. TRO-MP-086, 1--10.
|
| |
3
|
Van Erp, J. & Van Veen, H. (2004). Vibrotactile in-vehicle navigation system. Transportation Research Part F, 247--256.
|
| |
4
|
Wilson, D. B. (2001). Effect size determination program. Software.
|
| |
5
|
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. O. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
|
| |
6
|
Borenstein, M., & Rothstein, H. (1999). Comprehensive meta-analysis: A computer program for research synthesis. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Cockburn, A., Firth, A. (2003). Improving the acquisition of small targets. In proceedings of the HCI, 181--196.
|
| |
9
|
Diamond, D. D., Kass, S. J., Andrasik, F., Raj, A. K., & Rupert, A. H. (2002). Vibrotactile cueing as a master caution system for visual monitoring. Human Factors & Aerospace Safety, 2(4), 339--354.
|
| |
10
|
Forster, B., Cavina-Pratesi, C., Aglioti, S. M., & Berlucchi, G. (2002). Redundant target effect and intersensory facilitation from visual-tactile interactions in simple reaction time. Experimental Brain Research, 143(4), 480--487.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
Hopp, P. J., Smith, C. A. R., Clegg, B. A., & Heggestad, E. D. (2005). Interruption management: The use of attention-directing tactile cues. Human Factors, 47(1), 1--11.
|
 |
13
|
Faustina Hwang , Simeon Keates , Patrick Langdon , P. John Clarkson, Multiple haptic targets for motion-impaired computer users, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 05-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA
[doi> 10.1145/642611.642620]
|
 |
14
|
Robert W. Lindeman , John L. Sibert , Erick Mendez-Mendez , Sachin Patil , Daniel Phifer, Effectiveness of directional vibrotactile cuing on a building-clearing task, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1054972.1055010]
|
| |
15
|
Lindeman, R. W., Yanagida, Y., Sibert, J. L., & Lavine, R. (2003). Effective vibrotactile cueing in a visual search task. Proceedings of the Ninth IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT 2003), Sept. 1-5, 2003, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 89--96.
|
| |
16
|
McGee, M. R. (1999). A haptically enhanced scrollbar: Force-Feedback as a means of reducing the problems associated with scrolling, First PHANTOM Users Research Symposium, May, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany.
|
| |
17
|
Moorhead, I. R., Holmes, S., & Furnell, A. (2004). Understanding multisensory integration for pilot spatial orientation. QINETIQ/KI/CHS/TR042277.
|
 |
18
|
Ian Oakley , Marilyn Rose McGee , Stephen Brewster , Philip Gray, Putting the feel in ’look and feel‘, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.415-422, April 01-06, 2000, The Hague, The Netherlands
[doi> 10.1145/332040.332467]
|
| |
19
|
|
 |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
Tang, H., Beebe, D. J., & Kramer, A. F. (1997). Comparison of tactile and visual feedback for a multi-state input mechanism. IEMBS '97: Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 4 1697--1700.
|
| |
22
|
B. J. Unger , A. Nicolaidis , A. Thompson , R. L. Klatzky , R. L. Hollis , P. J. Berkelman , S. Lederman, Virtual Peg-in-Hole Performance Using a 6-DOF Magnetic Levitation Haptic Device: Comparison with Real Forces and with Visual Guidance Alone, Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, p.263, March 24-25, 2002
|
| |
23
|
Van Erp, J. B. F., & Verschoor, M. H. (2004). Cross-modal visual and vibrotactile tracking. Applied Ergonomics, 35(2), 105--112.
|
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.5
INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
H.5.2
User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
Subjects:
Graphical user interfaces (GUI)
Additional Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.5
INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
H.5.2
User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
Subjects:
Theory and methods;
Haptic I/O;
User-centered design
General Terms:
Design,
Experimentation,
Human Factors,
Performance
Keywords:
meta-analysis,
multimodal,
visual feedback,
visual-tactile feedback
|