|
ABSTRACT
In-network aggregation is an essential primitive for performing queries on sensor network data. However, most aggregation algorithms assume that all intermediate nodes are trusted. In contrast, the standard threat model in sensor network security assumes that an attacker may control a fraction of the nodes, which may misbehave in an arbitrary (Byzantine) manner.We present the first algorithm for provably secure hierarchical in-network data aggregation. Our algorithm is guaranteed to detect any manipulation of the aggregate by the adversary beyond what is achievable through direct injection of data values at compromised nodes. In other words, the adversary can never gain any advantage from misrepresenting intermediate aggregation computations. Our algorithm incurs only O(Δ log2 n) node congestion, supports arbitrary tree-based aggregator topologies and retains its resistance against aggregation manipulation in the presence of arbitrary numbers of malicious nodes. The main algorithm is based on performing the sum aggregation securely by first forcing the adversary to commit to its choice of intermediate aggregation results, and then having the sensor nodes independently verify that their contributions to the aggregate are correctly incorporated. We show how to reduce secure median, count, and average to this primitive.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
H. Cam, S. Ozdemir, P. Nair, D. Muthuavinashiappan, and H. O. Sanli. Energy-efficient secure pattern based data aggregation for wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 29: 446--455, 2006.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
W. Du, J. Deng, Y. Han, and P. K. Varshney. A witness-based approach for data fusion assurance in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2003.
|
| |
5
|
J. Girao, M. Schneider, and D. Westhoff. CDA: Concealed data aggregation in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Wireless Security, 2004.
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
L. Hu and D. Evans. Secure aggregation for wireless networks. In Workshop on Security and Assurance in Ad hoc Networks, 2003.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
P. Jadia and A. Mathuria. Efficient secure aggregation in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on High Performance Computing, 2004.
|
 |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
A. Mahimkar and T. Rappaport. SecureDAV: A secure data aggregation and verification protocol for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2004.
|
 |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
Suman Nath , Phillip B. Gibbons , Srinivasan Seshan , Zachary R. Anderson, Synopsis diffusion for robust aggregation in sensor networks, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, November 03-05, 2004, Baltimore, MD, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1031495.1031525]
|
| |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
|
 |
19
|
|
 |
20
|
|
CITED BY 18
|
|
|
|
|
Kazuhiro Minami , Adam J. Lee , Marianne Winslett , Nikita Borisov, Secure aggregation in a publish-subscribe system, Proceedings of the 7th ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society, October 27-27, 2008, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jens-Matthias Bohli , Alban Hessler , Osman Ugus , Dirk Westhoff, A secure and resilient WSN roadside architecture for intelligent transport systems, Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Wireless network security, March 31-April 02, 2008, Alexandria, VA, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bo Sun , Yang Xiao , Chung Chih Li , Hsiao-Hwa Chen , T. Andrew Yang, Security co-existence of wireless sensor networks and RFID for pervasive computing, Computer Communications, v.31 n.18, p.4294-4303, December, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|