ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Image classification using cluster cooccurrence matrices of local relational features
Full text PdfPdf (473 KB)
Source International Multimedia Conference archive
Proceedings of the 8th ACM international workshop on Multimedia information retrieval table of contents
Santa Barbara, California, USA
POSTER SESSION: Poster session 2: annotation, summarization, and visualization table of contents
Pages: 173 - 182  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-495-2
Authors
Lokesh Setia  Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
Alexandra Teynor  Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
Alaa Halawani  Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
Hans Burkhardt  Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 23,   Downloads (12 Months): 101,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1178677.1178703
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Image classification systems have received a recent boost from methods using local features generated over interest points, delivering higher robustness against partial occlusion and cluttered backgrounds. We propose in this paper to use relational features calculated over multiple directions and scales around these interest points. Furthermore, a very important design issue is the choice of similarity measure to compare the bags of local feature vectors generated by each image, for which we propose a novel approach by computing image similarity using cluster co-occurrence matrices of local features. Excellent results are achieved for a widely used medical image classification task, and ideas to generalize to other tasks are discussed


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
J. Amores, N. Sebe, and P. Radeva. Efficient object-class recognition by boosting contextual information. In IbPRIA (1), pages 28--35, 2005.
 
3
A. Barla, F. Odone, and A. Verri. Histogram intersection kernel for image classification. In ICIP (3), pages 513--516, 2003.
 
4
S. Belongie, J. Malik, and J. Puzicha. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts, 2001.
 
5
O. Chapelle, P. Haffner, and V. Vapnik. Svms for histogram-based image classification, 1999.
 
6
G. Csurka, L. Dance, J. Willamowski, and C. Bray. Visual categorization with bags of keypoints. In ECCV Workshop on statistical Learning in computer vision, pages 59--74, 2004.
 
7
L. Davis, S. Johns, and J. Aggarwal. Texture analysis using generalized co-occurrence matrices. PAMI, 3:251--259, 1979.
 
8
T. Deselaers, A. Hegerath, D. Keysers, and H. Ney. Sparse patch-histograms for object classification in cluttered images. In DAGM 2006, Pattern Recognition, 26th DAGM Symposium, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, page accepted for publication, Berlin, Germany, September 2006.
 
9
 
10
L. Fei-Fei, R. Fergus, and P. Perona. Learning generative visual models from few training examples an incremental bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories. In Workshop on Generative-Model Based Vision, Washington, DC, June 2004.
 
11
R. Fergus, P. Perona, and A. Zisserman. Object class recognition by unsupervised scale-invariant learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on CVPR, volume 2, pages 264--27, Madison, Wisconsin, 2003.
 
12
M. O. Gueld, M. Kohnen, D. Keysers, H. Schubert, B. B. Wein, J. Bredno, and T. M. Lehmann. Quality of DICOM header information for image categorization. In Proc. SPIE Vol. 4685, p. 280--287, Medical Imaging 2002:, pages 280--287, May 2002.
 
13
Haralick, Shanmugam, and Dinstein. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-3(6):610--621, 1973.
 
14
C. Hsu and C. Lin. A comparison of methods for multi-class support vector machines, 2001.
 
15
J. Huang, S. Kumar, M. Mitra, W. Zhu, and R. Zabih. Image indexing using color correlograms, 1997.
 
16
D. Keysers, C. Gollan, and H. Ney. Classification of medical images using non-linear distortion models. In Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin, pages 366--370, 2004.
 
17
 
18
T. M. Lehmann, H. Schubert, D. Keysers, M. Kohnen, and B. B. Wein. The IRMA code for unique classification of medical images. Medical Imaging 2003: Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 5033, pp. 440--451 (2003)., pages 440--451, May 2003.
 
19
 
20
E. Loupias and N. Sebe. Wavelet-based salient points for image retrieval, 1999.
 
21
R. Marée, P. Geurts, J. Piater, and L. Wehenkel. Biomedical image classification with random subwindows and decision trees. In Proc. ICCV workshop on Computer Vision for Biomedical Image Applications (CVIBA 2005), volume 3765 of LNCS, pages 220--229. Springer-Verlag, oct 2005.
 
22
 
23
M. Schael. Methoden zur Konstruktion invarianter Merkmale für die Texturanalyse. PhD thesis, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg, June 2005.
 
24
 
25
 
26
J. Vogel. Semantic Scene Modeling and Retrieval. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich, October 2004.
 
27


Collaborative Colleagues:
Lokesh Setia: colleagues
Alexandra Teynor: colleagues
Alaa Halawani: colleagues
Hans Burkhardt: colleagues