ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Voronoi diagram depth sorting for polygon visibility ordering
Full text PdfPdf (418 KB)
Source
Computer graphics and interactive techniques in Australasia and South East Asia archive
Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques in Australasia and Southeast Asia table of contents
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
SESSION: Faster, faster! table of contents
Pages: 461 - 467  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-564-9
Authors
Shinichi Fukushige  Osaka University
Hiromasa Suzuki  The University of Tokyo
Sponsor
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 43,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1174429.1174506
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Visibility determination is one of the oldest problems in computer graphics. The visibility, in terms of back-to-front polygon visibility ordering, can be determined by updating a priority list as the viewpoint moves. A new list-priority algorithm, utilizing a property of Voronoi diagrams, is proposed in this paper. In the preprocessing phase, the 3D space is divided into Voronoi cells in order to cluster polygons that can be assigned a fixed set of priority orders within the cluster. and during the post-processing phase, the clusters and contained polygons are depth-sorted correctly. The most time-consuming work is undertaken during the pre-processing phase that only has to be executed once for the scene. All the polygons in a cluster are pre-computed to obtain the view independent priority order within the cluster. Thus, a relatively simple task is left in the post-processing phase, which is only to sort the clusters repeatedly when the viewpoint is changed. One reason to explore list-priority algorithm is because they offer flexibility that hardware configuration (such as Z-buffer approach) do not possess. One example is that of rendering with the correct treatment of the translucency effects. Translucency is an important graphics effect that can be used to increase the realism of the rendered scene or to enable more effective visual inspection in visualization.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
Dur, A., and Leimgruber, S. 2003. A practical list-priority algorithm for 3d polygons. Journal of Graphics Tools 8, 25--36.
 
4
5
6
7
 
8
James, A., and Day, A. M. 1998. The priority face determination tree for hidden surface removal. Computer Graphics Forum 17, 55--71.
 
9
Morer, P., Garcia-Alonso, A. M., and Flaquer, J. 1995. Optimization of a priority list algorithm for 3-d rendering of buildings. Computer Graphics Forum 14, 217--227.
 
10
 
11
Schumacker, R. A., Brand, B., Gilliland, M. G., and Sharp, W. H. 1969. Study for applying computer-generated images to visual simulation. Technical Report AFHRL-TR-69-14, Air Force Human Resources Lab.
 
12
Sutherland, I. E., Sproull, R. F., and Schumacker, R. A. 1973. Sorting and the hidden-surface problem. In Proceedings of the National Computer Conference, 685--693.
13
 
14
Yao, F. F. 1980. On the priority approach to hidden-surface algorithms. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, 21st Annual, 301--307.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Shinichi Fukushige: colleagues
Hiromasa Suzuki: colleagues