ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A mixed method for evaluating input devices with older persons
Full text PdfPdf (190 KB)
Source ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility archive
Proceedings of the 8th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility table of contents
Portland, Oregon, USA
SESSION: Student research competition table of contents
Pages: 295 - 296  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-290-9
Author
Murni Mahmud  The University of Manchester, Manchester
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACCESS: ACM Special Interest Group on Accessible Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 75,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1168987.1169063
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This research is an exploratory study which introduces a mixed method in evaluating common input devices. The method includes both quantitative and qualitative approaches and considers both subjective and objective measures. The study incorporates psychometric tests to measure user ability, introduces real tasks in the evaluation, and interviews users to elicit their opinions regarding the important qualities of preferred devices. A mouse, a tablet-with-stylus and a touch screen have been evaluated in two tasks: browsing a website and playing a card game. This paper shows the mixed method has made possible a more nuanced understanding of the use of input devices by older persons.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Czaja, S. J., Sharit, J., Ownby, R., Roth, D. L. & Nair, S. Examining Age Differences in Performance of a Complex Information Search and Retrieval Task. Psychology and Aging 16(4) (2001), 564--579.
 
2
Creswell, J. W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publication, 2002.
 
3
Greenstein, J. S. & Arnaut, L. Y. Human factors aspects of manual computer input devices. In G. Salvendy (Eds), Handbook of Human Factors. New York: Wiley, 1987, 1450--1489.
 
4
Laursen, B., Jensen, B. & Ratkevicius, A.. Performance and muscle activity during computer mouse tasks in young and elderly adults. Eur J Appl Physiol., 84(4) (2001), 329--336.
 
5
MacKenzie, I. S. Motor behaviour models for human-computer interaction. In J. M. Carroll (Ed), Toward a multidisciplinary science of human-computer interaction. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 2003, 27--54.
 
6
Mahmud, M. & Kurniawan, S. Incorporating User Ability Test in Evaluating Pointing Devices. In Proceedings of HCI International, Las Vegas, 2005 (CD-ROM).
 
7
 
8
 
9