ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Design fragments make using frameworks easier
Full text PdfPdf (382 KB)
Source Conference on Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications archive
Proceedings of the 21st annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications table of contents
Portland, Oregon, USA
SESSION: Frameworks/tools table of contents
Pages: 75 - 88  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-348-4
Also published in ...
Authors
George Fairbanks  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
David Garlan  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
William Scherlis  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
SIGPLAN: ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 25,   Downloads (12 Months): 171,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1167473.1167480
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Object oriented frameworks impose additional burdens on programmers that libraries did not, such as requiring the programmer to understand the method callback sequence, respecting behavior constraints within these methods, and devising solutions within a constrained solution space. To overcome these burdens, we express the repeated patterns of engagement with the framework as a design fragment. We analyzed the 20 demo applets provided by Sun and created a representative catalog of design fragments of conventional best practice. By evaluating 36 applets pulled from the internet we show that these design fragments are common, many applets copied the structure of the Sun demos, and that creation of a catalog of design fragments is practical. Design fragments give programmers immediate benefit through tool-based conformance assurance and long-term benefit through expression of design intent.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
The Debian Linux Distribution. http://www.debian.org.
 
4
 
5
Gert Florijn, Marco Meijers, and Pieter van Winsen. Tool support for object-oriented patterns. In Mehmet Aksit and Satoshi Matsuoka, editors, Proceedings ECOOP '97, volume 1241 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 472--495, Jyvaskyla, Finland, June 1997.
 
6
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
14
15
 
16
 
17
18
19
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
Sun Microsystems. Java applets. http://java.sun.com/applets/.
 
24
 
25
Harold Ossher, William Harrison, Frank Budinsky, and Ian Simmonds. Subject-oriented programming: Supporting decentralized development of objects. In Proc. 7th IBM Conf. Object-Oriented Technology, July 1994.
26
 
27
 
28
Trygve Reenskaug, P. Wold, O. A. Lehne, and Manning. Working With Objects: The Ooram Software Engineering Method. Manning Pubns Co, 1995.
 
29
Charles Rich and Richard. C. Waters. The programmer's apprentice: A research overview. In D. Partridge, editor, Artificial Intelligence & Software Engineering, pages 155--182. Norwood, NJ, 1991.
 
30
Dirk Riehle. Framework Design: A Role Modeling Approach. PhD thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, 2000.
31
 
32
Tom Tourwé. Automated Support for Framework-Based Software Evolution. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 2002.
 
33


Collaborative Colleagues:
George Fairbanks: colleagues
David Garlan: colleagues
William Scherlis: colleagues