ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An introduction to competition-reachability of a graph
Full text PdfPdf (445 KB)
Source ACM Southeast Regional Conference archive
Proceedings of the 43rd annual Southeast regional conference - Volume 1 table of contents
Kennesaw, Georgia
SESSION: Algorithms and theory table of contents
Pages: 121 - 125  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-059-0
Authors
Suk Jai Seo  Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN
Peter J. Slater  University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 20,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1167350.1167391
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Let G be an undirected graph. A directed graph D obtained from G by assigning a direction to each edge in G is called an oriented graph. The reachability r(D) of a directed graph D is the number of ordered pairs of distinct vertices (x, y) with a directed path from x to y. Consider a graphical game associated with a graph G=(V, E) involving two players (maximizer and minimizer) who alternately select edges and orient them. The maximizer attempts to maximize the reachability, while the minimizer attempts to minimize the reachability, of the resulting digraph. If both players play optimally, then the reachability is fixed. Parameters that assign a value to each graph in this manner are called competitive parameters. We determine the competitive-reachability for special classes of graphs.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
J. H. Conway, On Numbers and Games, Academic Press, New York (1976).
3
 
4
A. Finbow and B. Hartnell, A game related to covering by stars, Ars Combin., 16A (1983) 189--198.
 
5
A. Finbow and B. Hartnell, A characterization of parity graphs containing no cycles of order five or less, Ars Combin., 40 (1995) 227--234.
 
6
P. C. Gilmore and A. J. Hoffman, A characterization of comparability graphs and of interval graphs, Canad. J. Math. 16 (1964) 539--548.
 
7
 
8
J. B. Phillips and P. J. Slater, An introduction to graph competition independence and enclaveless parameters, Graph Theory Notes of New York XLI (2001) 37--41.
 
9
J. B. Phillips and P. J. Slater, Graph competition independence and enclaveless parameters, Congr. Numer., 154 (2002) 79--99.
 
10
H. E. Robbins, A Theorem on Graphs with an Application to a Problem of Traffic Control, Amer. Math. Monthly 46 (1939), pp. 281--283.
11
 
12
S. J. Seo and A. T. Amin, On extremal oriented trees. Congr. Numer. 152 (2001) 55--63.
 
13
P. J. Slater, Enclaveless sets and MK-systems, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards, 82 (1977) 197--202.
 
14
P. J. Slater, O. Chan, and C. Chen, On a characterization of comparability graphs. Ars Combin. 23 (1987) 67--79.
 
15
P. J. Slater and Y. Wang, The competitive-acquisition number of paths, Congr. Numer., to appear.
 
16
H. Wang and A. T. Amin, On Optimal Acyclic Orientations of a Graph, Congr. Numer., 137 (1999), pp. 121--128.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Suk Jai Seo: colleagues
Peter J. Slater: colleagues