ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Using a low-cost electroencephalograph for task classification in HCI research
Full text AviAvi (26:32),  FlvFlv (26:32),  PdfPdf (591 KB)
Source Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology archive
Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology table of contents
Montreux, Switzerland
SESSION: Sensing from head to toe table of contents
Pages: 81 - 90  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-313-1
Authors
Johnny Chung Lee  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Desney S. Tan  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 56,   Downloads (12 Months): 234,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

appendices and supplements   abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1166253.1166268
What is a DOI?

APPENDICES and SUPPLEMENTS
Zipp81-slides.zip (20.63 MB),
Supplemental material for Using a low-cost electroencephalograph for task classification in HCI research


ABSTRACT

Modern brain sensing technologies provide a variety of methods for detecting specific forms of brain activity. In this paper, we present an initial step in exploring how these technologies may be used to perform task classification and applied in a relevant manner to HCI research. We describe two experiments showing successful classification between tasks using a low-cost off-the-shelf electroencephalograph (EEG) system. In the first study, we achieved a mean classification accuracy of 84.0% in subjects performing one of three cognitive tasks - rest, mental arithmetic, and mental rotation - while sitting in a controlled posture. In the second study, conducted in more ecologically valid setting for HCI research, we attained a mean classification accuracy of 92.4% using three tasks that included non-cognitive features: a relaxation task, playing a PC based game without opponents, and engaging opponents within the game. Throughout the paper, we provide lessons learned and discuss how HCI researchers may utilize these technologies in their work.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Anderson, C. W., & Sijerččić, Z. (1996). Classification of EEG Signals from Four Subjects During Five Mental Tasks. Proceedings of the Conference on Engineering Applications in Neural Networks, 407--414.
 
2
Brainmaster. http://www.brainmaster.com.
3
 
4
Coyle, S., Ward, T., & Markham, C. (2003). Brain-computer interfaces: A review. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 28(2), 112--118.
 
5
Cutmore, T. R. H, & James, D. A. (1999). Identifying and Reducing Noise in Physiological Recordings. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 32, 129--150.
 
6
 
7
Fisch, B. J. (2005). Fisch & Spehlmann's EEG primer: Basic principles of digital and analog EEG. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
 
8
Fitzgibbon, S. P., Pope, K. J., Mackenzie, L., Clark, C. R., & Willoughby, J. O. (2004). Cognitive tasks augment gamma EEG power. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1802--1809.
9
 
10
Gevins, A., Leong, H., Du, R., Smith, M. E., Le, J., DuRousseau, D., Zhang, J., & Libove, J. (1995). Towards measurement of brain function in operational environments. Biological Physiology, 40, 169--186.
 
11
Gevins, A. S., & Remond, A. (1987). Handbook of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology: Methods of analysis of brain electrical and magnetic signals. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
 
12
Gevins, A. S., Zeitlin, J. C., Doyle, J. C., Schaffer, R. E., & Callaway, E. (1979). EEG patterns during 'cognitive' tasks. II. Methodology and analysis of complex behaviors. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 47, 704--710.
 
13
Keirn, Z. A., & Aunon, J. I. (1990). A new mode of communication between man and his surroundings. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 37(12), 1209--1214.
14
 
15
Kramer, A. F. (1991). Physiological metrics of mental workload: A review of recent progress. In Multiple Task Performance (ed. Damos, D.L.), 279--328.
 
16
Mason, S. G., & Birch, G. E. (2003). A general framework for brain-computer interface design. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 11(1), 70--85.
17
 
18
OpenEEG Project. http://openeeg.sourceforge.net.
 
19
Palaniappan, R. (2005). Brain computer interface design using band powers extracted during mental tasks. Proceedings of the 2nd International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 321--324.
 
20
Picton, T. W., Bentin, P., Berg, P., Hillyard, S. A., Johnson, J. R., Miller, G. A., et al. (2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37, 127--152.
 
21
Smith, R. C. (2004). Electroencaphalograph based brain computer interfaces. Masters Dissertation, University College Dublin.
22
 
23
van Boxtel, G. J. M. (1998). Computational and statistical methods for analyzing event-related potential data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30(1), 87--102.
 
24
Witten, I. H., & Frank, E. (2005). Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques (2nd Edition), San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
 
25
Wolpaw, J. R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D. J., Pfurtscheller, G., & Vaughn, T. M. (2002). Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 767--791.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Johnny Chung Lee: colleagues
Desney S. Tan: colleagues