ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Sketching shiny surfaces: 3D shape extraction and depiction of specular surfaces
Full text PdfPdf (840 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) archive
Volume 3 ,  Issue 3  (July 2006) table of contents
Pages: 262 - 285  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:1544-3558
Authors
Ulrich Weidenbacher  University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Pierre Bayerl  University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Heiko Neumann  University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Roland Fleming  Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 113,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1166087.1166094
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Many materials including water, plastic, and metal have specular surface characteristics. Specular reflections have commonly been considered a nuisance for the recovery of object shape. However, the way that reflections are distorted across the surface depends crucially on 3D curvature, suggesting that they could, in fact, be a useful source of information. Indeed, observers can have a vivid impression of, 3D shape when an object is perfectly mirrored (i.e., the image contains nothing but specular reflections). This leads to the question what are the underlying mechanisms of our visual system to extract this 3D shape information from a perfectly mirrored object. In this paper we propose a biologically motivated recurrent model for the extraction of visual features relevant for the perception of 3D shape information from images of mirrored objects. We qualitatively and quantitatively analyze the results of computational model simulations and show that bidirectional recurrent information processing leads to better results than pure feedforward processing. Furthermore, we utilize the model output to create a rough nonphotorealistic sketch representation of a mirrored object, which emphasizes image features that are mandatory for 3D shape perception (e.g., occluding contour and regions of high curvature). Moreover, this sketch illustrates that the model generates a representation of object features independent of the surrounding scene reflected in the mirrored object.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Attneave, F. 1954. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review 61, 183--193.
2
 
3
Beck, J. and Prazdny, S. 1981. Highlights and the perception of glossiness. Perception & Psychophysics 30, 4, 407--410.
 
4
Benson, P. J. and Perrett, D. I. 1991. Perception and recognition of photographic quality facial caricatures: Implications for the recognition of natural images. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 3, 1, 105--135.
 
5
Biederman, I. 1987. Recognition--by--components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 94, 2, 115--147.
 
6
Blake, A. 1985. Specular stereo. In Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 973--976.
 
7
Blake, A. and Brelstaff, G. 1988. Geometry from specularity. In Proceedings of ICCV. 394--403.
 
8
Blake, A. and Bülthoff, H. H. 1990. Does the brain know the physics of specular reflection? Nature (London) 343, 165--168.
 
9
Blake, A. and Bülthoff, H. H. 1991. Shape from specularities: Computation and psychophysics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 331, 237--252.
 
10
 
11
Bullier, J. H., McCourt, M. E., and Henry., G. H. 1988. Physiological studies of the feedback connection to the striate cortex from areas 18 and 19 of the cat. Exp. Brain Res. 70, 90--98.
12
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
Daugman, J. 1988. Complete discrete 2d gabor transforms by neural networks for image analysis and compression. Trans. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Proc. 36, 7, 1169--1179.
 
17
18
 
19
 
20
Do Carmo, M. P. 1976. Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
 
21
 
22
Dwyer, F. M. J. 1967. Adapting visual illustrations for effective learning. Harvard Educational Review 37, 250--263.
 
23
Feldman, J. and Singh, M. 2005. Information along contours and object boundaries. Psychological Review 112, 243--252.
 
24
Fleming, R., Torralba, A., and Adelson, E. Three Dimensional Shape Perception (in press). Springer, Chapter Shape From Sheen.
 
25
Fleming, R., Torralba, A., Dror, R. O., and Adelson, E. H. 2003. How image statistics drive shape-from-texture and shape-from-specularity. J. Vision 3, 9, 73--73.
 
26
Fleming, R. W., Torralba, A., and Adelson, E. H. 2004. Specular reflections and the perception of shape. J. Vision 4, 9, 798--820.
 
27
Fraisse, P. and Elkin, E. H. 1963. Etude génétique de l'influence des modes de présentation sur le seuil de reconnaissance d'objets familiers. Année Psychologique 63, 1--12.
28
29
 
30
Grossberg, S. and Mingolla, E. 1985. Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures and neon color spreading. Psych. Rev. 92, 2, 173--211.
 
31
Hadamard, J. 1902. Sur les problémes aux dérivées partielles et leur signification physique. Princeton University Bulletin, 49--52.
 
32
Hartung, B. and Kersten, D. 2003. How does the perception of shape interact with the perception of shiny material? J. Vis. 3, 9 (10), 59--59.
33
34
35
 
36
Horn, B. and Brooks, M. 1985. Shape and source from shading. In Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 932--936.
 
37
 
38
Hubel, D. H. and Wiesel, T. N. 1968. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J. Physiology (London) 195, 215--243.
 
39
Ikeuchi, K. 1981. Recognition of 3-d objects using the extended gaussian image. In Proc. of the 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 595--600.
 
40
Interrante, V. and Kim, S. 2001. Investigating the effect of texture orientation on shape perception. Proc. Human Vision and Electronic Imaging 6, 330--339.
 
41
Interrante, V., Kim, S., and Hagh-Shenas, H. 2002. Conveying 3d shape with texture: Recent advances and experimental findings. Proc. Human Vision and Electronic Imaging 7, 197--206.
 
42
 
43
Kang, H., He, W., Chui, C., and Chakraborty, U. 2005. Interactive sketch generation. The Visual Computer 21, 9, 821--830.
 
44
Kim, S., Hagh-Shenas, H., and Interrante, V. 2003. Showing shape with texture: Two directions seem better than one. In Proc. Human Vision and Electronic Imaging 8, 332--339.
 
45
Koenderink, J. and van Doorn, A. 1980. Photometric invariants related to solid shape. Optica Acta 27, 7, 981--996.
 
46
Koenderink, J. J. 1984. What does the occluding contour tell us about solid shape. Perc. 13, 312--330.
 
47
 
48
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1960. Reflection and refraction at a random moving surface. i. pattern and paths of specular points. Journal of the Optical Society of America 50, 9, 838--844.
 
49
Neumann, H. and Sepp, W. 1999. Recurrent v1-v2 interactions in early boundary processing. Biol. Cybern. 81, 425--444.
 
50
Norman, J. F., Todd, J. T., and Orban, G. A. 2004. Perception of three-dimensional shape from specular highlights, deformations of shading, and other types of visual information. Psychological Science 15, 565--570.
 
51
 
52
Rhodes, G., Brennan, S., and Carey, S. 1987. Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces. Cognitive Psychology 19, 473--497.
 
53
Ryan, T. and Schwartz, C. 1956. Speed of perception as a function of mode of presentation. American Journal of Psychology 69, 60--69.
 
54
 
55
56
 
57
Savarese, S. and Perona, P. 2001. Local analysis for 3d reconstruction of specular surfaces. In Proc. of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 738--745.
 
58
59
60
 
61
Tinbergen, N. 1951. The Study of Instinct. Clarendon, Oxford.
 
62
Tinbergen, N. and Perdeck, A. C. 1950. On the stimulus situation releasing the begging response in the newly hatched herring gull chick (larus argentatus argentatus pont). Behaviour 3, 1--39.
 
63
Todd, J. and Mingolla, E. 1983. Perception of surface curvature and direction of illumination from patterns of shading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10, 740--745.
 
64
Todd, J., Norman, J., Koenderink, J., and Kappers, A. M. L. 1997. Effects of texture, illumination and surface reflectance on stereoscopic shape perception. Perception 26, 806--822.
 
65
Todd, J. T. 2004. The visual perception of 3d shape. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9, 3, 115--121.
 
66
Todd, J. T., Norman, J. F., and Mingolla, E. 2004. Lightness constancy in the presence of specular highlights. Psychological Science 15, 1, 33--39.
 
67
von der Heydt, R., Peterhans, E., and Baumgartner, G. 1984. Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. Science 224, 1260--1262.
 
68
 
69
 
70
 
71
 
72


Collaborative Colleagues:
Ulrich Weidenbacher: colleagues
Pierre Bayerl: colleagues
Heiko Neumann: colleagues
Roland Fleming: colleagues