ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Higher-order abstract syntax: setting the record straight
Full text PdfPdf (124 KB)
Source ACM SIGACT News archive
Volume 37 ,  Issue 3  (September 2006) table of contents
COLUMN: Logic: SIGACT news logic column 16 table of contents
Pages: 93 - 96  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISSN:0163-5700
Authors
Karl Crary  Carnegie Mellon University
Robert Harper  Carnegie Mellon University
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 14,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1165555.1165572
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A recent SIGACT News Logic column, guest-written by James Cheney DOI = 10.1145/1107523.1107537, discussed nominal logic [1], an approach to abstract syntax with binding structure. In addition to providing a worthy tutorial on nominal logic, that column leveled five criticisms at higher-order abstract syntax, an alternative approach for dealing with binding structure in abstract syntax. We argue below that three of those criticisms are factually inaccurate, and the other two are misguided.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
[1] M. J. Gabbay and A. M. Pitts. A new approach to abstract syntax with variable binding. Formal Aspects of Computing, 13:341-363, 2002.
2
 
3
[3] Frank Pfenning and Carsten Schürmann. Twelf User's Guide, Version 1.4, 2002. Available electronically at http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~twelf.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Karl Crary: colleagues
Robert Harper: colleagues