ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Methodological perspectives for legal ontologies building: an interdisciplinary experience
Full text PdfPdf (375 KB)
Source International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law archive
Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law table of contents
Bologna, Italy
SESSION: Research abstracts table of contents
Pages: 240 - 241  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-59593-081-7
Authors
Danièle Bourcier  CERSA - CNRS, University of Paris 2
Mélanie Dulong de Rosnay  CERSA - CNRS, University of Paris 2, Medialive
Jacky Legrand  University of Paris 2
Sponsors
: The International Association for Artificial Intelligence and Law
: CIRSFID
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 21,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1165485.1165528
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Legal ontologies design raises knowledge management but also jurisprudence issues. To which extent is it possible to establish common concerns between technical means and theoretical constraints?After a brief presentation of the network methodology, we give two convergent results of our working groups on the feasibility of legal ontologies. First, the definition of a meta legal language handling fundamentals (acts, actors, conditions...) contributes to a shared understanding of legal knowledge between disciplines and jurisdictions. Second, ontological alignment concerns not only knowledge management but is also the core of the judge's activity.



Collaborative Colleagues:
Danièle Bourcier: colleagues
Mélanie Dulong de Rosnay: colleagues
Jacky Legrand: colleagues