Perspectives to the classification of information interactions: the Cool and Belkin faceted classification scheme under scrutiny

ABSTRACT

The faceted classification system of information interactions proposed by Cool and Belkin is discussed in the light of two case studies. The two examples use the classification scheme as a structural research instrument in two different phases of investigation: in framing the collection of data and in the analysis of already existing data. The discussion is focussed on usability and the issues related to the classification scheme. We conclude that the proposed scheme is a workable instrument for studying complex information interactions with different kinds of research designs. The either premisory or post-collection use of the classification scheme was recognised to have effects on the classification outcome. The principal issues of using the scheme seemed to relate to the frequent overlap of the facets and the tendency of the classifications to be highly dependent on the perspectives of the study.

REFERENCES

• 1: Clare Beghtol. Semantic validity: Concepts of warrant in bibliographic classification systems. Library Resources and Technical Services, (April/June):109_125, 1986.
• 2: Geoffery C. Bowker , Susan Leigh Star, Sorting things out: classification and its consequences, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000
• 3: V. Broughton. The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval. Aslib Proceedings, 58(1/2):49_72, 2006.
• 4: Katriina Byström, Municipal administrators at work—information needs and seeking [IN&S] in relation to task complexity: a case-study amongst municipal officials, Proceedings of an international conference on Information seeking in context, p.125-146, August 1997, Tampere, Finland
• 5: Katriina Byström , Kalervo Järvelin, Task complexity affects information seeking and use, Information Processing and Management: an International Journal, v.31 n.2, p.191-213, March/April 1995 [doi>10.1016/0306-4573(94)00041-Z]
• 6: Elfreda A. Chatman. Life in a small world: Applicability of gratification theory to information-seeking behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(6):438_449, 1991.
• 7: Peter Checkland. Systems thinking, Systems practise. Wiley, 1981.
• 8: Colleen Cool and Nicholas Belkin. A classi_cation of interactions with information. In Emerging Frameworks and Methods: CoLIS 4, pages 1_15. Libraries Unlimited, Greenwood Village, Colorado, 2002.
• 9: Brenda Dervin. Qualitative research in information management, chapter From the mind's eye of the "user": The sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology, pages 61_84. Libraries Unlimited, Englewood Cli_s, CO, 1992.
• 10: David Ellis. Modeling the information-seeking patterns of academic researchers. Library Quarterly, 63(4):469_486, 1993.
• 11: James J. Gibson. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1986.
• 12: B. v. d. Hooff and A. d. Ridder. Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and cmc use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6):117_130, 2004.
• 13: Isto Huvila. The ecology of information work _ A case study of bridging archaeological work and virtual reality based knowledge organisation. PhD thesis, Forthcoming. Åbo Akademi University, 2006.
• 14: Elin K. Jacob , Hanne Albrechtsen, When essence becomes function: post-structuralist implications for an ecological theory of organisational classification systems, Exploring the contexts of information behaviour, Taylor Graham Publishing, London, UK, 1999
• 15: A. Krishna and E. Schrader. Understanding and measuring social capital, chapter The social capital assessment tool, pages 17_40. International Bank for Reconstruction and Developments, Washington:, 2002.
• 16: Carol Collier Kuhlthau. Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1993.
• 17: G. J. Leckie, K. E. Pettigrew, and C. Sylvain. Modeling the information seeking of professional: a general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers. Library Quarterly, 66(2):161_193, 1996.
• 18: Gloria J. Leckie , Karen E. Pettigrew, A general model of the information seeking of professionals: role theory through the back door?, Proceedings of an international conference on Information seeking in context, p.99-110, August 1997, Tampere, Finland
• 19: Yuelin Li. Task type and a faceted classification of tasks. In Linda Schamber and Carol. L. Barry, editors, ASIST 2004: proceedings of the 67th ASIS&T Annual Meeting, volume 41 of Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, Medford (N.J.), 2004. Information Today.
• 20: Markku I. Nurminen , Vesa Torvinen, Role-based Interpretation of ISs, Turku Centre for Computer Science, 1996
• 21: Rubén Prieto-Díaz, Implementing faceted classification for software reuse, Communications of the ACM, v.34 n.5, p.88-97, May 1991 [doi>10.1145/103167.103176]
• 22: Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan. Colon classification: basic classification. Asia Publishing, Bombay, 6th edition, 1963.
• 23: Paul Solomon. Information behavior in sense making: A three-year case study of work planning. In Pertti Vakkari, Reijo Savolainen, and Brenda Dervin, editors, Information Seeking in Context. Proceedings of an International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts 14--16 August 1996, Tampere, Finland. Taylor Graham, 1997.
• 24: Susan Lee Star. Grounded classification: grounded theory and faceted classification. Library Trends, 47(2):218_232, 1998.
• 25: Anselm Strauss. Work and the division of labor. The Sociological Quarterly, 26(1):1_19, 1985.
• 26: Lucy Suchman. Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design, chapter Making a case: 'knowledge' and 'routine' work in document production, pages 29_45. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
• 27: T. R. Tyler and S. L. Blader. Identity and co-operative behaviour in groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4(3):207_226, 2001.
• 28: Isto Vatanen. A_ordances and constraints in knowledge organization. In Suliman Hawamdeh, editor, Knowledge Management: Nurturing Culture, Innovation and Technology. Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Knowledge Management, Singapore, 2005. World Scienti_c.
• 29: G. Widén-Wulff and E. Davenport. Information sharing and timing: findings in two Finnish organizations. In F. Crestani and I. Ruthven, editors, Information Context: Nature, Impact, and Role: 5th International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Sciences, CoLIS 2005, Glasgow, UK, June 4--8, 2005, volume 3507 of LNCS, pages 32--46, Heidenberg, 2005. Springer-Verlag.
• 30: G. Widén-Wul_ and M. Ginman. Explaining knowledge sharing in organizations through the dimensions of social capital. Journal of Information Science, 30(5):448_458, 2004.
• 31: Gunilla Widén-Wul_. Motives for sharing: Social networks as information sources. Advances in Library Administration and Organization, tba:tba, 2006.
• 32: Gunilla Widén-Wul_. Challenges of Knowledge Sharing in Practise: A Social Approach. Chandos, Oxford, 2007 (forthcoming).
• 33: Tom Wilson. On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 37(1):3__15, 1981.
• 34: M. Woolcock and D. Narayan. Social capital: implications for development theory, research, and policy. World Bank Research Observer, 15(2):225_249, 2000.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.3 INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL
      H.3.3 Information Search and Retrieval

General Terms:
Human Factors

Keywords:
contextual information interaction theory (theoretical tools for IIiX), evaluation, evaluation and research methodologies for IIiX (research design)