ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The QoS-RWP mobility and user behavior model for public area wireless networks
Full text PdfPdf (569 KB)
Source International Workshop on Modeling Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems archive
Proceedings of the 9th ACM international symposium on Modeling analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems table of contents
Terromolinos, Spain
SESSION: Mobility and routing table of contents
Pages: 375 - 384  
Year of Publication: 2006
ISBN:1-59593-477-4
Authors
Giovanni Resta  IIT -- CNR, Pisa -- ITALY
Paolo Santi  IIT -- CNR, Pisa -- ITALY
Sponsors
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 59,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1164717.1164781
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Congestion is expected to become a prominent problem to deal with as the popularity of wireless data networks continues to increase. However, this problem can in principle be mitigated if a fraction of the network users could decide to move to another location in case their perceived QoS degrades. To account for this, we propose an extension of the well-known RWP model called QoS-RWP, in which users are divided into mobile users displaying constrained movement patterns, and QoS-driven users who are mainly stationary, but they can decide to move to a better location to improve their QoS level. Another enhancement of QoS-RWP with respect to the original RWP model is that waypoints are chosen according to an access point (AP) popularity metric, which reflects the recently observed phenomenon that different APs in a wireless data network display very different degrees of popularity among users. The QoS-RWP model also accounts for different classes of load offered to the network by the users, and for different channel access methods. Based on QoS-RWP, we perform a simulation-based analysis of network usage under different combinations of network parameters such as the number of users, number of APs, relative fraction of QoS-driven users, and channel access method. Our investigation discloses interesting insights on network usage, and shows that our model is able to capture important properties observed in real-world network deployments.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
4
 
5
6
 
7
R. Bruno, M. Conti, E. Gregori, "Mesh Networks: Commodity Multihop Ad Hoc Networks", IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 43, n. 3, pp. 123--131, March 2005.
 
8
T. Camp, J. Boleng, V. Davies, "Mobility models for ad hoc network simulations", Wireless Communication & Mobile Computing (WCMC), special issue on mobile ad hoc networking, Wiley, 2002.
 
9
Aironet 1240AG data sheets, available at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless.
 
10
 
11
M. Heusse, F. Rousseau, G. Berger-Sabbatel, A. Duda, "Performance Anomaly of 802.11b", Proc. IEEE Infocom 03, 2003.
 
12
W. Hsu, K. Merchant, H. Shu, C. Hsu, A. Helmy, "Preference-based Mobility Model and the Case for Congestion Relief in WLANs using Ad Hoc Networks", Proc. IEEE VTC 04, 2004.
13
14
 
15
D.B. Johnson, D.A. Maltz, "Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks", Mobile Computing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 153--181, 1996.
 
16
17
 
18
J.Y. LeBoudec, M. Vojnovic, "Perfect Simulation and Stationarity of a Class of Mobility Models", Proc. IEEE Infocom 05, pp. ??, 2005.
19
20
21
22
 
23
W. Navidi, T. Camp, "Stationary Distributions for the Random Waypoint Mobility Model", IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, Vol. 3, n. 1, pp. 99--108, 2004.
 
24
G. Resta, P. Santi, "The QoS-RWP Mobility and User Behavior Model for Public Area Wireless Networks", Tech. Rep. IIT-TR-03/2006, Istituto di Informatica e Telematica, Pisa - Italy, May 2006.
 
25
M. Satyanarayanan, "Pervasive Computing: Vision and Challanges", IEEE Personal Communications, Vol. 8, n. 4, pp. 10--17, August 2001.
26
 
27
C. Tuduce, T. Gross, "A Mobility Model based on WLAN Traces and its Validation", Proc. IEEE Infocom 05, pp. 664--674, 2005.
 
28
J. Yoon, M. Liu, and B. Noble, "Random Waypoint Considered Harmful", Proc. IEEE Infocom, (San Francisco, CA), April 2003.
29

Collaborative Colleagues:
Giovanni Resta: colleagues
Paolo Santi: colleagues