|
ABSTRACT
In the past two years, several papers have proposed rules that suggest two to five orders of magnitude reduction in Internet core router buffers. Others present scenarios where buffer sizes need to be significantly increased. So why the different rules? In this paper we briefly compare the different results and proposals, and summarize some recent preliminary experiments to validate the proposals. We'll see that different results apply to different parts of the network, and depend on several assumptions. For example, we believe that buffers can be safely reduced by an order of magnitude in the routers in service provider backbone networks; but it would be premature to reduce them in routers closer to the edge.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
NetFPGA project. http://yuba.stanford.edu/NetFPGA/.
|
| |
2
|
A. Aggarwal, S. Savage, and T. Anderson. Understanding the performance of TCP pacing. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, pages 1157--1165, Tel-Aviv, Israel, March 2000.
|
 |
3
|
Guido Appenzeller , Isaac Keslassy , Nick McKeown, Sizing router buffers, Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, August 30-September 03, 2004, Portland, Oregon, USA
|
| |
4
|
N. Beheshti, Y. Ganjali, R. Rajaduray, D. Blumenthal, and N. McKeown. Buffer sizing in all-optical packet switches. In Proceedings of OFC/NFOEC, Anaheim, CA, March 2006.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
C. S. Chang, D. S. Lee, and C. K. Tu. Recursive construction of fifo optical multiplexers with switched delay lines. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 50(12):3221--3233, December 2004.
|
| |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
N. Dukkipati, Y. Ganjali, and R. Zhang-Shen. Typical versus worst case design in networking. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets-IV), College Park, Maryland, November 2005.
|
| |
10
|
M. Enachescu, Y. Ganjali, A. Goel, N. McKeown, and T. Roughgarden. Routers with very small buffers. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM'06, Barcelona, Spain, April 2006. ¡br¿Also available as technical report TR05-HPNG-060606, High Performance Networking Group, Stanford University.
|
| |
11
|
Y. Ganjali and N. McKeown. Experimental study of router buffer sizing. Manuscript. Also available as technical report, HR06-HPNG-07-30-00, Stanford University, July 2006.
|
| |
12
|
D. K. Hunter, M. C. Chia, and I. Andonovic. Buffering in optical packet switches. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 16:2081--2094, December 1998.
|
| |
13
|
H. Park, E. F. Burmeister, S. Bjorlin, and J. E. Bowers. 40-gb/s optical buffer design and simulations. In Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD), 2004.
|
| |
14
|
G. Raina and D. Wischik. Buffer sizes for large multiplexers: Tcp queueing theory and instability analysis. In EuroNGI, Rome, Italy, April 2005.
|
| |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
M. Wang and Y. Ganjali. Unifying buffer sizing results through fairness. Manuscript submitted for publicatoin. Also available as technical report, HR06-HPNG-060606, Stanford University, June 2006.
|
|