Ontologies for supply chain simulation modeling

ABSTRACT

Simulation might be an effective decision support tool in supply chain management. The review of supply chain simulation modeling methodologies revealed some issues one of which is the practicability of simulation in the supply chain environment. The supply chain environment is dynamic, information intensive, geographically dispersed, and heterogeneous. In order to develop usable supply chain simulation models, the models should be feasibly applicable in the supply chain environment. Distributed simulation models have been used by several researchers, however, their complexity and usability hindered their continuation. In this paper, a new approach is proposed. The approach is based on Ontologies to integrate several supply chain views and models, which captures the required distributed knowledge to build simulation models. The Ontology core is based on the SCOR model as the widely shared supply chain concepts. The ontology can define any supply chain and help the user to build the required simulation models.

REFERENCES

• 1: Berners-Lee, T. 1998. Semantic Web Roadmap, from <http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html>
• 2: Fayez, M., Axelsson, P., & Hosni, Y. 2003. Information intensive projects: planning and optimizing using the Design Structure Matrix (DSM). Paper presented at the 2003 Industrial Engineering annual conference, Portland, Oregon.
• 3: Huang, G. Q., Lau, J. S. K., & Mak., K. L. 2003. The Impacts of Sharing Production Information on Supply Chain Dynamics: a review of the literature. International Journal of Production Research, 41(7), 1483--1517.
• 4: KBSI. 2003. Integrated DEFinition methods IDEF. from <http://www.kbsi.com>
• 5: Motwani, J., Madan, M., & Gunasekaran, A. 2000. Information technology in managing global supply chains. Logistics Information Management, 13(5), 320--327.
• 6: OMG. Unified Modeling Language (UML). <http://www.uml.org>
• 7: Prasad, S., & Tata, J. 2000. Information investment in supply chain management. Logistics Information Management, 13(1), 33--38.
• 8: SCC. 2003. Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) Model V.6.0.
• 9: Swaminathan, J. M., Sadeh, N. M., & Smith, S. F. 1997. Effect of sharing supplier capacity information. Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley.
• 10: Thonemann, U. W. 2002. Improving supply chain performance by sharing advance demand information. European Journal of Operational Research, 142(1), 81--107.
• 11: W3C. (2003a). Resource Description Framework (RDF), from <http://www.w3.org/RDF>
• 12: W3C. (2003b). World Wide Web Consortium- Semantic Web. Retrieved 2003
• 13: Yu, Z., Yan, H., & Cheng, T. C. E. 2001. Benefits of information sharing with supply chain partnerships. Industrial Management, 101(3), 114--121.
• 14: Zhao, X., Xie, J., & Zhang, W. J. 2002. The impact of information sharing and ordering co-ordination on supply chain performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7(1), 24--40.