|
ABSTRACT
In this paper we describe an architecture for the evaluation and optimization of aircraft ground movements in apron taxiways. The paper aims at providing an effective methodology for supporting the decision-makers involved in both the apron design and management phases. The purpose deriving from the utilization of the proposed approach consists in obtaining substantial improvements in the level of service with a reduction in congestion and ground delays within airports while considering safety aspects like aircraft separation. The methodology relies on a modular architecture. A simulation-based architecture, in which an optimization module is included, has been developed; an information feedback between simulation and optimization modules is enabled. The validation has been performed through the data of the apron of Rome-Fiumicino Airport. The computational results show a reduction in aircraft flowtime and a relevant decrease in aircraft ground flows. Interesting issues related to strategic modification of system configuration are presented.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Andersson, K., Carr, F., Feron, E., Hall, W. 2000. Analysis and Modelling of Ground Operations at Hub Airports, 3rd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Naples, Italy
|
| |
2
|
Andreatta, G., Brunetta, L., Odoni, A., Righi, L., Stamatopoulos, M., Zografos, K. 1998. A set of approximate and compatible models for airport strategic planning on airside and landside, 2nd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Orlando, Fl, USA
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Assaeroporti (Associazione Italiana Gestori Aeroporti) 2005. <http://www.assaeroporti.it>, {accessed March 9, 2005}
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Capozzi, B. J. 2003. Automated Airport Surface Traffic Control, Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation, & Control Conference, Austin, Tx, USA, ed. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
EUROCONTROL (European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation). 2003. Definition of A-SMGCS Implementation Levels
|
 |
10
|
Fred Glover , James P. Kelly , Manuel Laguna, New advances for wedding optimization and simulation, Proceedings of the 31st conference on Winter simulation: Simulation---a bridge to the future, p.255-260, December 05-08, 1999, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
[doi> 10.1145/324138.324223]
|
| |
11
|
Gotteland, J., Durand, N., Alliot, J. M., Page, M. 2001. Aircraft Ground Traffic Optimization, 4th International Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar ATM2001, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
| |
12
|
Law, A., Mc Comas, M. 2000. Simulation-based Optimization, Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. J. A. Joines, R. R. Barton, K. Kang, and P. A. Fishwick, 46--49. Available via: <http://www.informs-sim.org/wsc00papers/008.PDF> {accessed June 20, 2005}
|
| |
13
|
Odoni, A., Deyst, J., Feron, E., Hansman, R., Khan, K., Kuchar, J., Simpson, R., 1997. Existing and required modeling capabilities for evaluating ATM systems and concepts. International Center for Air Transportation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. Available via: <http://web.mit.edu/aeroastro/www/labs/AATT/aatt.html>, {accessed March 9, 2005}
|
| |
14
|
Stamatopoulos, M. A., Zografos, K. G., Odoni, A. R. 2004. A Decision Support System for airport strategic planning, Transportation Research Part C 12, 91--117, ed. Elsevier Ltd.
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
THENA Consortium, THEmatic Network on Airport Activities. 2002. D1.4.1 Position Paper on Airport Simulation & Modelling Issues, EC DG-TREN Transport Programme (2.2.1/12), 5FP, Contr.: GTC/2000/28022
|
| |
17
|
Yan, S., Shieh, C., Chen, M. 2002. A simulation framework for evaluating airport gate assignments, Transportation Research Part A 36, 885--898, ed. Elsevier Science Ltd.
|
|