ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The use of simulation for productivity estimation based on multiple regression analysis
Full text PdfPdf (318 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 37th conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Orlando, Florida
SESSION: Construction engineering and project management: construction engineering I table of contents
Pages: 1492 - 1499  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:0-7803-9519-0
Authors
Seungwoo Han  Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA
Daniel W. Halpin  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Publisher
Winter Simulation Conference 
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 42,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Productivity estimation has been fundamental subject investigated in academia and industry. There are two common methods for estimation of productivity: (1) deterministic and (2) simulation methods. The deterministic method does not reflect actual conditions, such as randomness of work duration, whereas simulation method can overcome this limitation. However, the user without a background in simulation may struggle with implementation due to the difficulty of modeling. The presented productivity estimation model in this research was created using multiple regression analysis with data generated by WebCYCLONE. The model representing the mathematical relations between conditions and productivity allows planners or site personnel to estimate productivity by simply entering input data reflecting actual site conditions. In academia, the research methodology utilized in this research provides a framework for the user to establish other application models for estimating or evaluating the performances of new technologies.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
AbouRizk, S. M. and Halpin D. W. (1992). Statistical properties of construction duration data. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 118(3), pp525--544.
 
2
Devore, J. L. (2000). Probability and statistics (5th Edition). Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA, U.S.A.
 
3
Halpin, D. W. (1973). An investigation of the use of simulation networks for modeling construction operations. Ph.D. Dissertation of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, U.S.A.
 
4
Halpin, D. W. and Riggs, L. S. (1992). Planning and analysis of construction operations. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, U.S.A.
 
5
 
6
Kannan, G. (1999). A methodology for the development of a production experience database for earthmoving operations using automated data collection. Ph. D. Dissertation of Civil Engineering in Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University at Blacksburg, VA. U.S.A.
 
7
 
8
 
9
Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J. and Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied linear statistical models (4th Edition). WCB/McGraw Hill, Boston, MA, U.S.A.
 
10
Collaborative Colleagues:
Seungwoo Han: colleagues
Daniel W. Halpin: colleagues