ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Procedures for feasibility detection in the presence of multiple constraints
Full text PdfPdf (126 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 37th conference on Winter simulation table of contents
Orlando, Florida
SESSION: Analysis methodology A: simulation optimization: selection procedures I table of contents
Pages: 692 - 698  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:0-7803-9519-0
Authors
Demet Batur  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Seong-Hee Kim  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Publisher
Winter Simulation Conference 
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 17,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we address the problem of finding a set of feasible or near-feasible systems among a finite number of simulated systems in the presence of stochastic constraints. Andradóttir, Goldsman, and Kim (2005) present a procedure that detects feasibility of systems in the presence of one constraint with a pre-specified probability of correctness. We extend their procedure to the case of multiple constraints by the use of the Bonferroni inequality. Unfortunately, the resulting procedure tends to be very conservative when the number of systems or constraints is large. As a remedy, we present a screening procedure that uses an aggregated observation, which is a linear combination of the collected observations across stochastic constraints. Then, we present an accelerated procedure that combine the extension of Andradóttir, Goldsman, and Kim (2005) with the procedure that uses aggregated observations. Some experimental results that compare the performance of the proposed procedures are presented.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Andradóttir, S., D. Goldsman, and S.-H. Kim. 2005. Fully sequential procedures for comparing constrained systems via simulation. To appear in Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. M. E. Kuhl, N. M. Steiger, F. B. Armstrong, and J. A. Joines. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey.
 
2
Batur, D. and S.-H. Kim. 2005. Finding a set of feasible systems when the number of systems or constraints is large. Working paper, School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
 
3
 
4
Santner, T. J., and A. C. Tamhane. 1984. Designing experiments for selecting a normal population with a large mean and a small variance. In Design of Experiments --- Ranking and Selection: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Bechhofer, ed. T. J. Santner and A. C. Tamhane, 179--198. New York: Marcel-Dekker.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Demet Batur: colleagues
Seong-Hee Kim: colleagues